https://imgur.com/a/PqkhdGd (edit: corrected link to album with finished pics)
This is using an IT8951 EPD controller I wrote a little Rust driver for, which indeed talks SPI, although its SPI frontend is really a quirky/leaky abstraction over an I80 interface so you have to e.g. do chip select using I80 semantics and send preambles and such. Still, pretty breezy overall.
Can confirm the power draw is of course "bursty" during the update. Also, yes, e-ink refresh times get slower in colder temps. e-ink refresh also works poorly in direct sunlight. The displays can also "dry out" from it and it can cause artifacts. But the envelope for normal operation is overall fairly good, certainly for home/indoor use.
There's a fair amount of manufacturing tolerance and during testing manufacturers will usually record preferred drive voltages for the individual unit, etc. It's quite important to configure software to make use this information for optimal performance.
I'm hoping it will run for about a year without recharging from that little 1100 mAh LiPo pouch at one update a day (the newspaper is rendered on a common home server RasPi using LuaLaTeX+Ghostscript and then retrieved over Wifi), having taken self-discharge into account.
It looks really cool!
It's this product, which is built around a ED133UT2 panel by E Ink: https://www.waveshare.com/product/displays/e-paper/epaper-1/...
You can find this unit and other IT8951-based driver boards for it on a few different places/in different catalogs but Waveshare's easy and the price seems OK.
The ED133UT2 is a Carta 1200 display. The latest Carta gen is the 1250, but AIUI it's only relevant for color displays with the change being a thinner film that allow plastic color filters to be closer to the ink to improve contrast. I think the current greyscale 13.3" offered by E Ink's direct shop for $449 sans driver is still a 1200 - at least many vendors list VB3300-NCB as just an alternate name for the ED133UT2. The Carta range of displays are well-known from Amazon's Kindle and many other reader products, so my newspaper is basically a big honking DIY Kindle.
They also offer a 10.3" panel with even higher resolution for half the price of the 13.3" that's supported by the same controller and should be fantastic for all sorts of home dashboards.
Direct sunlight can also be a big problem for this display tech, so I'm intentionally hanging it on a wall facing away from the most intense daytime sunlight I get.
Hope it survives at least a couple of years.
I saw something like this a couple of years ago and wanted to do it myself. However the cost was relatively unattainable at the time, I'm glad to see it is getting more affordable!
While cobbling together my project I was really tempted to go custom PCB with the ESP and the ITE controller on one board. Looks like this eschews the seperate controller entirely and instead uses ESP32 PSRAM for the framebuffer and has the driving waveforms embedded in the MCU firmware etc. Very neat, also one further level of "go deeper", would love to try one!
Additional benefit is that they're quick to refresh, if you have an application that requires it. I have a calculator built with it, works perfectly.
You might want to check out Kagi to summarize articles: https://labs.kagi.com/ai/sum. It does the heavy lifting of producing nice outputs for you.
https://github.com/eikehein/hyelicht <- I get a little obsessive with that when documenting/releasing DIY stuff ... :-)
E-ink should be, but it never seems to get there. Too low-contrast and/or too expensive. It's been a Real Soon Now technology for about two decades.
There was another persistent display technology - chomeric displays. They came from a company called Chomerics, which was acquired by Parker Hannefin, which dropped the product line. Almost everything about those has disappeared from the Web, except that the former factory is now a Superfund site.[1]
[1] https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/CurSites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0...
I talked to someone building related tech in the industry and E-Ink the company has a stranglehold on suppliers and leverages that to force compliance despite the patent nearing expiration (blocking anyone else from getting access to those suppliers).
The patent has allowed them to become entrenched and all current suppliers to depend on them. This will be hard to correct even with patent expiration.
I don't remember the specific details (unfortunately) and it's second hand info, but I was disappointed to hear it from someone more involved than I.
Lots of companies do this. Amazon demands exclusivity for certain book sales, and they have contracts with sellers that make it hard for other marketplaces to undercut them. Qualcomm is famous for abusive practices. The list goes on.
In general, IMO companies should be able to compete by offering a superior product and/or a superior price point and/or a superior experience. They should not be able to compete by getting in each others’ way.
However, because Congress and the whole government is inherently illegitimate as is easily objectively measured by its constant, frequent, and persistent failure to abide by the constitution; things like industry capture of government and fraudulent regulatory bodies, is now the norm.
Consumers don't accept the disadvantages of eInk, such as the low refresh rate, the apparent low contrast, and the extremely poor color reproduction. At the same time, the advantages are rather minuscule; in fact, people have a hard time distinguishing eInk from reflective LCD. They think reflective display == eInk, while in truth many devices popularly seen as "eInk" are actually reflective LCDs (e.g. the Pebble and Garmin smartwatches).
Most companies that have made non-LCD based products are simply out-sold by LCD products and go bankrupt. I could probably name half-a-dozen non-LCD reflective technologies which are dead today without even checking Wikipedia, like Gyricon, Mirasol, the stuff the OLPC used, Flepia, etc. All of them dead or niche.
You just can't point fingers at eInk since some of these technologies faded even before eInk even existed, and some of them are owned by companies which are at least ten times larger than eInk (Qualcomm, Fujitsu, etc.). These theories claiming that eInk is the large neighborhood bully just don't many any sense whatsoever. Qualcomm, for example, _is_ a well-known bully; unlikely to be scared of eInk's portfolio. But Qualcomm released exactly 1 product with Mirasol - which completely flopped in the market - and then gave up on it.
Even price displays are usually LCDs, with only a minority being eInk, but as you can see here, casual hackers have a hard time distinguishing between them. The small displays they put on smartcards (showing a 2FA or the like) are also LCDs, and even with a practically minuscule battery they last for half a decade, and that's refreshing itself once per hour... I couldn't think of a better usecase for eInk, and yet it fails to beat a much cheaper plain old LCD, save for perhaps if you wear polarizing glasses...
Why do people make up crazy stories about banks conspiring with the bond-rating agencies to sell bogus financial products to their clients, oltimately crashing the entire market and driving themselves into bancrupsy. I mean, no rational person would do such a thing!
They still sell those on Digikey: https://sharpdevices.com/memory-lcd/
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/sharp-microelectr...
This is an LCD screen with active-power measured in micro-amps. This means that memory-lcd is more power-efficient than e-ink even if it updates once every 5 minutes. (though the less you update, the better e-ink gets).
It’s ~somewhat similar to a calculator 8 segment display in operation - low power, low resolution/pixel density, can be inverted etc. Or maybe old gameboys perhaps?
I have a very nice setup with Zotero, where I can sync papers I want to read to the tablet (running Zoo for Zotero), read and mark them up, and then sync the marked up version back to my computer.
You can set a custom screensaver image, so if what you're looking for is something truly static you might be able to do something with that.
Works well, w/ great battery life, and it really has come into its own w/ the new Kindle Scribe --- a large screen e-ink device which works as an e-reader and has useful note-taking and annotation capabilities (looking forward to seeing what competitors do w/ it --- probably would have bought an Onyx Tab Ultra if the Scribe hadn't been available).
I'd really like to see an affordable display suited to a Raspberry Pi, ideally w/ touch.
Every price tag at my local grocery store is eInk. Like there must be thousands. I'm guessing there are updated by wifi. I mean that is pretty damn good use and the refresh rate means you saw real energy over LCD.
Consider products that have their price automatically decline as they approach their expiry. Huge amounts of food would avoid wastage.
I don't know if they have batteries and wi-fi, or if they're updated manually with NFC, but either way they can't be too expensive if there are 5000+ in every store. They're a bit smaller than the badges these guys made, but they might be a lot cheaper and easier to work with.
Yes, yes, yes, and other methods. These are called "Electronic Shelf Labels", and there's a whole slew of competitors.
WiFi is very high power, so its "pull only twice a day" kinda setup. You have a radio that only turns on twice a day to contact the server. Zigbee is also a solution, though that requires a Zigbee router (coordinator? I forget the terminology). Much less power on Zigbee, but if you're deploying hundreds/thousands of these ESLs, I think the benefits of Zigbee low power outweigh the penalties.
NFC exists but I don't think I've ever seen them in person. Probably too much effort since it'd require a human walking around the store?
I've even seen ESLs that work off of infrared. You're supposed to install IR LEDs all around the store, and they can it all shelf-labels to update. IR receivers are the lowest power, so this is the only way you can feasibly "push" data to a shelf label. (Wifi and Zigbee are "pull only").
So some computer blasts the IR signal around the whole store, which is enough information to transmit to change all the prices apparently. Like a giant broadcast remote control.
Sure, you can't do it today, but I'd be surprised if we don't see it in 20 years.
n=1, but I'm using a single CR2032 with a Badger 2040 (same as OP) and a DS3231 in parallel and it works just fine down to ~2.8 volts.
I hope more of those little DIY/maker breakout boards adopt it. Pimoroni sells one. The one in my project is a free sample dev board that Micro Crystal sent me on request - which I guess is working out for them considering I just shared their product with you all.
That said getting good partial refresh performance out of a panel like this requires a good controller and good code (after having written a driver for one such controller recently), and developers and product integrators have gotten more refined at this. Refresh speed and display quality are still a trade-off here though, expressed as different waveforms when driving the same display.
But given that coin discs input/output are heat-dependent based on your comment, and no knowledge, would it not be sound to place CR coin batts in a baffle of graphene-aero-gel which could be just mm thicc and shield them from said temp inflections? This would greatly increases life, and can be moulded and produced en-mass with little effort and minimal cost (especially if you encase batteries used in space flight etc - and one may use the non-conductive format to use aerogells as an extremely light and thin insulating layer for many a thing.
Imagine the ability to 'spray' an AeroGel sealant onto a component which is heat sensitive to its accuracy...
Try reading these: https://data.energizer.com/pdfs/cr2032.pdf
https://data.energizer.com/pdfs/lithiumcoin_appman.pdf
Hopefully that answers any questions you have. You might need to research some other bits of knowledge to build up your base EE skillset, but once you're able to read those documents + understand them, I think you'll be in a good spot.
Don't do this. It will work for a short time, but this basically just drains one of the CR2032 cells dead.
The issue is that lithium cells have very little discharge slope, so by the time the two voltages equalize, one of the cells is about to die.
This is in contrast to alkaline batteries which have quite a bit of discharge slope, so the two batteries can equalize voltage with most of their battery life still remaining.
You could start with SSD1306 (monochrome, 3.3V) and SSD1331 (16-bit color, boosted voltage required). They speak I2C and SPI, and have decent software support.
The cheap and cheerful ones are <=1" diagonally though, so you need to step off the happy path to find badge-sized ones.
These are cheap enough that you can pretty much buy what you want and sample them yourself.
I know there are other stores that have better prices. But Digikey has a very good selection and has data-sheets for most of their offerings.
---------
I personally like the Sharp memory-lcd display. But your milage may vary. Monochrome is fine for my uses
It's not so slow, you can even play Dino Game on Badger 2040: https://twitter.com/niu_tech/status/1598804559270486033
1. E-ink requires a number of external components, even with their "chip on glass". In particular, E-ink requires a high voltage to change and charge the ink. I've seen inductors on most of these reference designs.
2. E-Ink is very slow especially at this price range. Static images are fine, but don't expect animations.
3. E-ink protocols take a "temperature". In my cases, I've just been hard coding it to 25C / Room temperature, but this suggests that low-temperatures or high-temperatures may change the behavior of the screen.
4. E-ink is very "bursty" with power, using more power than LCD when changing images, but then zero power for most of its life. Be sure to think carefully about the current associated with this burst, especially if you're using small CR2032 coin cells (which have ~10 to ~100 ohms of internal resistance). A ~100mA draw on the charge inductor isn't out of the question (at 10-ohms, that's a voltage drop of 1V, which probably browns-out the RP2040). A slow-start circuit could solve this but you'd need to consider the longer charge times. Another method is to have 2x CR2032 cells in parallel, which lowers IR (parallel resistors lower resitance). I'd be most interested in studying the power-network of this design, I bet there's some interesting things going on here.
5. Most E-ink screens seem to be some kind of SPI protocol (4 wire). This is very similar to mini-LCD screens.
---------
LCD screens use more power, but get you color, more resolution, animation and seem to be cheaper still. Furthermore, LCD requires fewer external components (maybe a charge-pump set of capacitors, but some LCD screens don't even need that). Note that color/resolution/animation all costs processor power / storage / RAM, so be careful what you wish for.
LCD might be more suitable for beginners. But e-ink is very cool and awesome.