Did you read it? Because that is not what it says. That page also explains how they:
* fingerprint your device, and your biometrics, and ID your device even when you don't log in
* collect your location information even if you deny OS permissions
* collect information about your viewing habits
* collect and share information from data brokers
* share information with foreign companies in their corporate group, and comply with all legal requests. (and there's a link for more detail that returns a 404)
Simply put, an app cannot do something that would require permissions, without it (unless exploiting vulns). Do you perhaps mean IP location? Which is incomplete, can be spoofed, or manipulated.
I agree that no app should probably have this power, but what the original commenter posits, is that TikTok is overreaching. Where "over" is compared to everyone else (including western media). Even, most websites collect this information with or without consent.
I don't think it is just about 'profiling people based on app usage'. I have not seen any other social networking app that does this [0] and after suggesting that ByteDance having no access to US data outside of China, well there's this investigation. [1] [2]
> I've not seen any movement on banning those similarly.
That's because they (Facebook, Instagram, Snap, etc) have instead been fined by the regulators in the hundreds of millions. Don't want a ban? Pay a giant fine for such privacy violations like the rest of the social networking companies have done.
[0] https://futurism.com/tiktok-spy-locations-specific-americans
[1] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emilybakerwhite/tiktok-...
[2] https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilybaker-white/2022/12/22/tik...
Missing one of those factors would make something much less of a threat in practice
There's no other reason besides this. American empire and its vassal states (like canada) are feeling threatened by the rise of the east.
This is just what's publically announced, because companies have no international recourse against China. They sure as hell won't release info about obtaining profiles of various US officials. The CCP can tell Chinese corps to do whatever it wants them to do. It's not like the US. And to think they haven't leveraged the most effective psy-op and surveillance tool in the world is, honestly, quite naive.
China bans all Western social media tech in the widest way possible for more than a decade and the minute a Western govt enacts a ban on govt devices, folks say this is unfair.
The US should make the data collection itself illegal for everyone and be done with it. They're currently walking this weird path where the exact same data collection is fine if it's Americans doing. It's not one set of rules for everyone.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/042915/why-f...
Any source to backup your claim?
“We need to figure out a solution that is in line with our principles and what we want to do, and in line with the laws there, or else it’s not going to happen. Right now, there isn’t an intersection.”
> Foreign govt interference is the issue. If tomorrow Google were controlled by a hostile foreign govt., they would face the same bans.
So it _is_ simply because it's foreign. How long do you think Google would survive in the US if it didn't comply with US requests? It does comply with requests and three letter agencies have access to data (as per Edward Snowden).
If your stance is that it's fine when we do it but not when others do it then that's just what it is.
No, it doesn’t. Read again. Was a fair trial held? No. End of story.
CCP does not rule according to laws. The only laws are CCP’s words and now Do’s words.
And you have a false equivalence here. TikTok has CCP board members and is not banned for US citizens.
> So it _is_ simply because it's foreign. How long do you think Google would survive in the US if it didn't comply with US requests? It does comply with requests and three letter agencies have access to data (as per Edward Snowden).
For a while. There would be court cases. Companies refuse US govt requests all the time and fight it in a court of law. A Snowden equivalent in China would be killed and not just a fugitive.
It is necessary for a free society to ban certain things.
Our govt already mandates a lot.
Never said it was -- if you follow the thread you'll see I was replying to someone pointing out that China has banned US social networks. The implication being that true US banning TikTok would only be fair, or something like that.
> We already ban a ton of stuff.
We do... and those bans do limit freedom, by definition. We've accepted that in a lot of cases -- few are arguing that child porn should be anything but banned, for example -- but I doubt we'd accept a government ban or restriction on, say, League of Legends simply because kids spend too much time on it.
You replied to me. I simply said this is not unfair.
> ban or restriction on, say, League of Legends simply
Stepping away from hypotheticals: A lot of countries have restrictions on what you and you can't do with govt resources. E.g., there are restrictions on what carriers you can use if you fly with govt. funding. Other countries have similar rules. There is nothing wrong or unfair or "freedom limiting" with the US govt banning a likely foreign govt. controlled app from govt. devices.
https://www.gsa.gov/policy-regulations/policy/travel-managem...
Though they are hardly alone in the 'misguided employees' department. Ebay had a whole scheme where they flew out a security team to harass and stalk a couple that had criticized ebay in a blog post. https://www.npr.org/2022/09/30/1126078948/live-spiders-and-c...
I think Facebook and Uber had their own location tracking scandals as well.
The bit that somewhat surprises me is the focus on TikTok, other apps are (AFAIK) capable of the exact same thing. Is the expectation that TikTok is the only app that the Chinese government have access to? this seems a bit unlikely.
And of course this doesn't touch on the companies that provide ad networks and other services to mobile applications, who have the ability to pull info from multiple apps at the same time, I've not seen any movement on banning those similarly.