News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by mattnewton on Monday February 27, 2023 @09:08PM (#34964786)
Playing devil’s advocate, wouldn’t sufficient adoption making additional attention expensive solve this problem here?
Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by deet on Monday February 27, 2023 @09:23PM (#34964885)
Or sufficient adoption will make governments adopt a quite cheap (and even potentially profitable) solution: make obfuscation through such means illegal and subject to fine.

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if a liberal reading of existing laws in many US states might over this already.

Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by lolinder on Monday February 27, 2023 @09:35PM (#34964957)
Yep. It's similar to people who count on crypto to solve government interference in finance.

You can't solve a culture of pervasive government surveillance by inventing new tech, because that tech will just be outlawed or regulated to death (see the UK online safety bill). You have to change the culture that makes governments think they have the right to see everything.

Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by trieste92 on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:57AM (#34966466)
> You can't solve a culture of pervasive government surveillance by inventing new tech, because that tech will just be outlawed or regulated to death

I call bs. New regulation moves slower that the rate at which people can find workarounds

Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by tetha on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @04:49AM (#34967523)
Regulation can be made very broad and up to interpretation by judges though.

You could setup something like "Circumvention of facial recognition using dedicated technical devices at demonstrations is considered disguising at a demonstration and follows the same laws" in germany.

And sure, this would result in a lot of lawsuits, discussions, escalations through different courts while the regulation is being tested - and it might be struck down entirely - but it would stand for a while and strike down _all_ workarounds.

Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by lolinder on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @09:48AM (#34969844)
Sure, a few people will always do that, skirting the borders of the law. But I don't want a situation where 99% of the population is constantly surveilled while 1% finds workarounds. I want to solve the problem, I want surveillance to die in the mainstream, and in this space new regulation moves faster than mainstream adoption of new tech.
Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by TEP_Kim_Il_Sung on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @02:44AM (#34966721)
"If regulation can stop the tech, it's the wrong tech." —DYIWEH
Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by beached_whale on Monday February 27, 2023 @10:13PM (#34965217)
It is illegal for license plates in some places. But I cannot see a free country doing that for people walking or even people inside vehicals.
Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by bondant on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @06:09AM (#34968036)
Well I don't know if you would consider France a free country or not, but it is illegal to hide your face in public space in France (unless it's for medical reasons or for a special event and so on). So I guess hiding your face from the face recognition system would be also illegal.

https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F21613

Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by t0bia_s on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @08:22AM (#34968973)
I wasn't long time ago wearing a mask mandatory on many places. So I guess it would be fine to cover face "because of fear from covid"?
Re:Unidentified Halo, an anti-surveillance wearable project by beached_whale on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @06:57PM (#34976710)
I would say it’s a law that violates what is generally a freedom of expression.