News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Super Resolution: Image-to-Image Translation Using Deep Learning in ArcGIS Pro. Parent comment

Re:Super Resolution: Image-to-Image Translation Using Deep L... by shiftpgdn on Friday February 17, 2023 @10:45AM (#34835956)
30/50cm per pixel are the maximum allowable by law in the US for "civilians". I'm sure we could do even better if allowed.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Super Resolution: Image-to-Image Translation Using Deep L... by astrange on Friday February 17, 2023 @11:22AM (#34836615)
"Satellite" images on maps are often not from satellites but rather planes or drones.

I guess with this technique you could do ML image synthesis guided by SAR satellites - that way you could sort-of look through clouds from space, as long as you don't mind the image being largely fictional.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Super Resolution: Image-to-Image Translation Using Deep L... by m2fkxy on Friday February 17, 2023 @11:09AM (#34836375)
Some companies are working on 10 centimeters.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Super Resolution: Image-to-Image Translation Using Deep L... by TOMDM on Friday February 17, 2023 @01:48PM (#34838687)
I'm having trouble finding citations on the specific law, but this website states that the US has capped satellite imagery for civilian use at 0.31 m

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c02365

[ Parent | on HN ]