Re:Tesla recalls 362,758 vehicles, says full self-driving be...
by qup on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:46PM
(#34823616)
To me it's weird you can voice an opinion like "I won't use it" and then say it's nice on the highway, as if you've given it enough of a trial there to endorse it when you think otherwise it's going to be killing people.
Re:Tesla recalls 362,758 vehicles, says full self-driving be...
by CharlesW on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:51PM
(#34823730)
How is it weird that FSD might work well on extremely simple, boring stretches of road but fall apart as complexity increases?
Re:Tesla recalls 362,758 vehicles, says full self-driving be...
by qup on Thursday February 16, 2023 @08:22PM
(#34829416)
Not that weird, it's just weird to recommend it after you've seen it almost kill you. I doubt he's put in the requisite time/miles/effort/observation/whatever to know that it does great on the highway but not elsewhere.
There's solid objects on highways, too.
Re:Tesla recalls 362,758 vehicles, says full self-driving be...
by helf on Friday February 17, 2023 @10:48AM
(#34835989)
Because the Tesla fans will cling to anything to further their arguments.
Re:Tesla recalls 362,758 vehicles, says full self-driving be...
by bdcravens on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:56PM
(#34823793)
Pretty sure almost crashing into a solid object seems good enough for giving it a failing score.
Re:Tesla recalls 362,758 vehicles, says full self-driving be...
by qup on Thursday February 16, 2023 @08:21PM
(#34829406)
I definitely agree, in which case I wouldn't find myself endorsing it for any use. Just because I drove X amount of miles without a problem on the highway doesn't mean it's any less likely to drive into a solid object, why would he recommend it?
It's nice on the freeway though.