Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by bushbaba on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @09:26PM
(#34814189)
I’m surprised those aren’t being shifted to much cheaper ARM chips.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by dboreham on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @09:29PM
(#34814218)
Perhaps they're not cheaper.
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by philistine on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @10:35PM
(#34814666)
I bet they will in due time. They have to recompile their whole stack to ARM, which probably isn't easy, but ARM is eating the world. It's only a matter of time.
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by hulitu on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:05AM
(#34815627)
That's what they said about Itanium too. /s
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by pfdietz on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:29AM
(#34815745)
I think that's clearly not an apt analogy.
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by otabdeveloper4 on Thursday February 16, 2023 @03:37AM
(#34816421)
The 80-core ARM servers Hetzner provides are great. A nice midpoint between a slower general-purpose x86_64 server and an expensive and brittle GPU server.
I can easily see datacenters with these things in the future.
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by Sakos on Thursday February 16, 2023 @04:27AM
(#34816686)
Probably a question of performance. NAS and IoT appliances have performance requirements too.
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by MikusR on Thursday February 16, 2023 @06:55AM
(#34817572)
Majority of consumer nases are running the cheapest oldest arm and mips cpus they can find.
Re:AMD Grabs over 30% CPU Market Share as Intel Continues to...
by creshal on Thursday February 16, 2023 @07:28AM
(#34817815)
Low-end NASes have been using ARM for a long time.
The higher end x86 NASes are advertised closer to "home datacentre in a box" solutions that offer VM/container runtimes and third party software markets.
So far, x86 is significantly more user friendly and performant for these use cases: the "desktop-ish performance for desktop-ish prices" range doesn't really have many hardware options (Apple certainly won't sell theirs to OEMs, and the Snapdragon 8c is a bit on the low end, and the real data centre ARM many-core monsters are too big); and the software offerings aren't quite as user friendly either.