The way Tesla gets paid is by users paying for the charge. It isn't complicated.
Are you making the argument that non-Teslas should be charged more than Tesla users. I'm fine with that but I think that wouldn't be allowed under this new provision.
In Europe, Tesla charges Tesla drivers less for charging and other drivers more. Tesla also has membership pricing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y33AArvMUQ
Other charging networks also have brand specific deals and membership pricing.
Okay but this is a theoretical statement and doesn't really jive with the current existing environment. This is a goal, not a method to achieve it.
There is no mystery here. This is not theoretical. It's the practical reality:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_WjeH3I8p8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPIhazPcY64
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI5EnOo05BE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=theiiFWydmo
Yes Tesla should be paid if they're being forced to subsidize their competitors. The entire point of Tesla's charging system is that it's non-profit making. It's based on the idea that it's acts as a value-add to Tesla vehicles. If Tesla is going to allow access to competitors, then yes Tesla needs to be paid for that access, or charge differential rates between Tesla and non-Tesla vehicles.