Re:Twitter was down because an employee accidentally deleted...
by adlpz on Sunday February 12, 2023 @11:13AM
(#34763934)
I'm sure they severely messed up in a bunch of things during the layoffs. And things broke in the process.
But the catastrophic scenario that some people painted, where Twitter was basically walking dead timebomb ready to crash irreparably at any second, wasn't true, clearly.
Re:Twitter was down because an employee accidentally deleted...
by ceejayoz on Sunday February 12, 2023 @11:20AM
(#34764002)
“The engineers did a better job building a resilient system than we expected” speaks well for the fired folks, but doesn’t preclude it eventually hitting a point where that resiliency runs out.
Re:Twitter was down because an employee accidentally deleted...
by playingalong on Sunday February 12, 2023 @11:41AM
(#34764218)
It rather speaks well for the original engineers who laid out the foundation. It might be a totally different set of people than these in 2022, fired or not
TLDR: Twitter is old.
Re:Twitter was down because an employee accidentally deleted...
by watwut on Sunday February 12, 2023 @01:07PM
(#34765117)
I would interpret that part as "original twitter architecture was actually well done and resilient" then anything else. It just means that many of those systems were better done originally then legend had it.
The severe and immediate loss of advertising however was not just a minor messed up part of the takeover. The money making parts of business is something that does matter.
> The problematic side was the business side, so if laying of a few thousand people extended the runway to figure things out, it made all the sense.
They fired people selling ads and people caring about customers (meaning ad buyers). Which directly caused loss of income.