News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by topspin on Saturday February 11, 2023 @09:56PM (#34759201)
> jumping with both feet to conclusions

What conclusions?

I'd actually like to see some conclusions. So far all we have is 'objects'.

Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by ggm on Saturday February 11, 2023 @10:11PM (#34759306)
"Reported" objects. On a complex radar system which has filters in the process of being re-tuned, because of concern things have been missed but now, there are more false positives: radar is complicated and weather, dust, floating metallised party balloons, insects, migrating birds can generate signals.
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by dylan604 on Saturday February 11, 2023 @10:58PM (#34759566)
>migrating birds can generate signals.

Great, so you're setting up Pearl Harbor 2.0

Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by nubinetwork on Sunday February 12, 2023 @01:50AM (#34760552)
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by yowzadave on Sunday February 12, 2023 @12:10AM (#34760029)
The conclusion that this is even worthy of the attention of everyday citizens, and not a routine case of floating trash?
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by topspin on Sunday February 12, 2023 @02:31AM (#34760728)
"everyday citizens" shouldn't have an interest in what the US military is shooting at over North America?
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by westhom on Sunday February 12, 2023 @12:30AM (#34760134)
WSJ is reporting the Alaska object was metallic balloon with suspended payload.