Now make the tool add paragraphs and it could generate some readable text

Summary: The FAA has classified airspace around Havre, MT as "national defense airspace" and all aircraft flight operations are prohibited within this area. Exceptions are made for national security and law enforcement aircraft, as well as air ambulance and other urgent government response aircraft. All aircraft already airborne when the restriction is enacted must exit the area as quickly and safely as possible.

Notam 3/4763 FDC: Temporary Flight Restrictions in airspace around Havre, MT. Classified as 'NTL defense airspace'. Pilots must adhere to the Requirements or face potential administrative action, civil penalties, revocation of airmen certificates, criminal charges, use of deadly force against the aircraft, or interference, disruption, seizure, damaging, or destruction of UAS.

All aircraft flight operations are prohibited within an area defined as 485411n1101823w to 481105n1101922w to 481145n1091337w to 485516n1091407w to the point of origin. SFC-34,000' MSL. Exceptions: National security aircraft operations under direction of Department of Defense, law enforcement, air ambulance, and other urgent governmental response aircraft operations with authorization from ATC.

All aircraft already airborne within the defined airspace must exit the area using the most expeditious route consistent with safety and in coordination with ATC as appropriate. Department of Defense tel 850-283-5242 is the CDN facility.

There's a lot of, to my read, stupid bureaucratic stuff in there, like about the penalties. Are all of the notams like this? I would have expected that they were effectively mandatory by virtue of being issued and didn't need all the stupid warnings

America does not follow the law. Americans do not follow the law. They may decide to risk it and the punishments are clearly laid out for the enterprising lawbreaker or journalist.

True, but this approach of posting things in exhaustive detail everywhere from city parks to the sky is (imho) part of why people don't follow the laws. There are too many of them, and only austistic nerds like myself read all of that shit.

The actual information here could be summarized as 'WARNING: AS OF (time), ALL AVIATORS MUST KEEP OUT OF (zone) DUE TO A NATIONAL DEFENSE ALERT, INCIDENT #####. WE WILL SHOOT YOUR DUMB ASS.'

I don’t disagree. Guessing it’s their logic because they’re bureaucratic, but you’re right. Nobody can follow the law if they don’t understand the law.

* * *

There are many different reasons a TFR can be issued, with varying levels of restrictions and penalties.

Some you can fly through if you follow the right procedures, others are effectively off limits.

Some you'll get your license suspended for flying through, others you risk being shot down.

The formatting could definitely be improved, but they do indeed need to clarify the nature of the restrictions since every TFR is unique.

I presume anything after "Pursuant" is boiler plate legalise text that goes with every notam message?

I do not spend much time looking at NOTAMs but I do not believe this type of wording is found with every NOTAM message. From what I have seen it is usually attached to NOTAMs pertaining to TFRs or security, as a way to establish authority. 49 USC is U.S. Code Title 49 (Transportation) and 14 CFR Chapter I is Code of Federal Regulations, Aeronautics and Space, FAA, DOT.

That's a lot of text obscuring "we might decide to kill you, and that will be just fine". I might have even moved that up above "we might fine you".

Is intellicaps to be found anywhere, like a tarball or code repository?

Neat tool, this looked like a perfect ChatGPT task; gave it a prompt to make it readable and less confusing, and then the original notice, and got this:

NOTAM (Notice to Airmen): 3/4763 FDC 3/4763 ZLC

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a temporary flight restriction in the airspace of Havre, Montana. This area is classified as "National Defense Airspace" by the FAA and is subject to the following restrictions:

- Pilots who do not follow the procedures outlined in this notice may be intercepted, detained, and interviewed by law enforcement or security personnel.

- The FAA may take administrative action against a pilot who does not comply with the requirements, such as imposing civil penalties and revoking airmen certificates. The United States government may pursue criminal charges, including charges under 49 USC Section 46307.

- The United States government may use deadly force against an aircraft if it poses an imminent security threat.

- Unmanned aircraft operators who do not comply with airspace restrictions are warned that the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, or the Department of Justice may take security action that results in interference, disruption, seizure, damaging, or destruction of the unmanned aircraft deemed to pose a credible safety or security threat.

- All aircraft operations are prohibited within an area defined as 485411N1101823W to 481105N1101922W to 481145N1091337W to 485516N1091407W to the point of origin, from the surface to 34,000 feet MSL (Mean Sea Level), effective immediately until further notice. - Exceptions:

A) National security aircraft operations under the direction of the Department of Defense.

B) Law enforcement, air ambulance, and other urgent government response aircraft operations with authorization from air traffic control (ATC). ATC must secure pre-approval by the on-duty National Tactical Security Operations Air Traffic Security Coordinator.

All aircraft already airborne within the defined airspace when this restriction becomes effective must exit the area using the most expeditious route consistent with safety and in coordination with air traffic control as appropriate.

For questions or further information, please contact the Department of Defense at 850-283-5242

Yeah, but now I'm wondering if the text is editorialized in some odd way. So it went from unreadable to unreliable.

Quick scan and of course it already randomly omitted words. ChatGPT is really just designed to bedazzle people who don't realize whats going on.

Chatgpt is awful if you need accuracy which is vital here. Don't use it for stuff like this, please.

You're totally right, but we both know someone is going to build this into some tool tomorrow, and it will mostly work. I think we might actually need legislators to step in to say that any use of ML would require review prior to use in life-critical applications...

Thank you, this is much more readable. If you wanted, you could use nltk for tagging the proper nouns, although your method works really well.