An ad hominem attack based on a single word and your extreme displeasure of it?
You've outdone GGP in the contest of inserting a superfluous word. The criticism here is the same as above, which is of intentionally bad grammar, in fact. You both know and yet you choose to employ poor grammar as a writing style, and I think it's likely due to vanity. Speech would be different, but neither of you are speaking. You're writing in an editable field and expressing beyond the content of the meaning of your words to compulsively insert a caricature of yourselves which obviously could not be accurate. It's wanting to appear a certain way and ironically having the opposite effect. If I was doing it, I would want to uuuhhhhh know. I just did it there to further drive the point home that I don't need space words to think because I can take all the time I want, because I am typing in an editable field. I think it's also likely that though you understand completely, you're going to feign as though you don't as convincingly as you can, because there's a problem of which you and GGP are unaware and my drawing attention to it is uncomfortable, aggravating the anxiety and self-consciousness. The trick is to stop trying to be or appear as something, and just be something, whatever it is you are, rather than pretending. So, yeah, do you, like, get it, or whatever?
Do you have anything substantive to say about the comments themselves as opposed to a hyperfixated diatribe based on a single superfluous word? Because everyone and their grandmothers is bored of your “holier than thou” soapbox ramblings about how you perceive random people on the internet.
And just because you clearly don’t get it, the word “even” can be used for emphasis when something you are reacting to is absurd. Crazy thing, English, eh?
I wonder who that person is in this conversation.
Once again, and for the last time, do you have anything to say about the comments themselves, or are you just going to keep breaking the guidelines to get your rocks off on insulting others and their grammar over a single word?
Here we go again. Do you not understand the difference between speaking and writing? When composing an editable comment, you need not include the words you use when speaking to give yourself more time to think about what to say. You can take all the time you want to think and then make your thoughts clear before hitting reply, and you can also edit the comment. I can't fathom why you would waste a reader's time by indicating you had to think for a second before completing your thoughts. Let's see, well, um, could it be a problem with ego? Definitely.
> You inferred qualities that don't exist in real life and hyperfixated on those instead of what was written
I have no earthly idea what you are talking about. I inferred qualities that don't exist?? What are you referring to, exactly? Because I think instead you've just graduated your unsound reasoning to straw man.
Think about Figma. They don't charge for how many drawings you make - that would seem ludicrous, especially since most of the compute power required to use the product is expended during client-side code execution. So instead, Figma charges you for using the app itself, but only once you want to add another collaborator to your private projects (at which point you're obviously happy with the product and probably willing to pay).
If you want to monetize this, I would encourage you to think along those same lines. You are building a product for somebody - but for whom? You can answer that question by letting people use it for free and seeing who likes it the most - marketers? news article editors? - and then building more features to focus the product on their use case.
Don't think about charging by volume - think about getting consistent usage from users who face this problem often, and then figure out how to integrate into their existing workflows. Then charge them money to do that.
Here are a couple of examples.
