News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A pocket sized open-source AR device for the imaginative ... by birdyrooster on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @03:49PM (#34699360)
Aren’t lasers high energy? Why would you ever want that pointing into your eye? Why not project regular light?
Re:A pocket sized open-source AR device for the imaginative ... by once_inc on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @03:58PM (#34699513)
Lasers are regular light, just all pointed in the same direction. The output of the laser (its capacity) is what makes it "high energy" and the number of photons hitting your retina is directly responsible for any warming of the tissue. A laser capable of just a bit of power, enough to outshine regular daylight by a little bit would be more than enough in most cases to make it feasible without concerns to your eyes damaging.
Re:A pocket sized open-source AR device for the imaginative ... by croes on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @04:07PM (#34699662)
Re:A pocket sized open-source AR device for the imaginative ... by tootie on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @04:29PM (#34699972)
Laser just means the light is tightly focussed in a beam. It says nothing of intensity or wavelength. Those little pen-size laser pointers run on AAA batteries.
Re:A pocket sized open-source AR device for the imaginative ... by pastdiscovery on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @03:56PM (#34699478)
Can/has been done before. To make VRDs safe, they need to be dimmed with a filter, but it's achievable.
Re:A pocket sized open-source AR device for the imaginative ... by sleepybrett on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @06:28PM (#34701497)
A bunch of research at the University of Washington in the mid to late 90s. Has a working display. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/vrd.html