News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CA Cities to Lose All Zoning Powers in 2 Days by rootusrootus on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @02:45PM (#34600780)
> Much better than suburbia in my opinion.

I think a lot of people just assume that the only kind of suburbia that exists is endless tract housing as far as the eye can see. I'm absolutely positive that does happen, but I've never lived in a suburban neighborhood that fit such a description. We have stores. We have business parks here and there. Heck, we even have public transit.

This is probably why there is such a dichotomy between those who hate suburbia, and those who love it. Different experiences piggybacking on the same terminology.

Re:CA Cities to Lose All Zoning Powers in 2 Days by chrisfinazzo on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @03:28PM (#34601467)
If you find your way to my other comment ("suburban sprawl") this is largely what it looked like to me when I visited my brother. The developments aren't very large and there is roughly nothing around them.

Contrast to NJ, where the NYC suburbs extend way outside Midtown and the city limits.

As a result, it is very rare to feel like you are in the middle of nowhere.

Re:CA Cities to Lose All Zoning Powers in 2 Days by runarberg on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @03:12PM (#34601209)
I don’t think parent was denying that, or at least I don’t get a sense of this dichotomy in the text. As someone that lives on Vashon island (what some consider a suburb of Seattle; but I actually consider rural King County), I got the sense that suburbia here was specifically directed at the endless tract of housing one (so like East Bellevue, Kent, or large parts of Kirkland), but not actual small towns around the main city (like Bothel, Lynnwood, Kirkland proper, or—well—Vashon) or even other dense urban areas like Burien or Redmond.