Re:Insulation: First the body, then the home (2011)
by mihaaly on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @05:34AM
(#34593523)
Correct, thanks for highlighting that, I edited to explicitly note (beyond 'energy efficient ventillation') that there are heat preservation techniques to use (heat exchangers) with the elevated level of ventilation needs while avoiding high energy loss.
Re:Insulation: First the body, then the home (2011)
by _benedict on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @06:35AM
(#34593872)
“Standard” is a bit strong, maybe? I think the majority of new homes still use trickle ventilation because it’s much cheaper, and not many homes have them retrofitted?
They are certainly common, but I think far from standard.
Re:Insulation: First the body, then the home (2011)
by bluGill on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @08:46AM
(#34594922)
Last I checked 20 years ago it was required. This was Minnesota though, where insulation code is generally more up to date than other parts of the US.
Re:Insulation: First the body, then the home (2011)
by _benedict on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @09:07AM
(#34595134)
The original comment referenced the U.K., where it is definitely not required, but is becoming more common.
I am surprised at the idea that MVHRs have been required anywhere for as much as 20 years.
Re:Insulation: First the body, then the home (2011)
by bluGill on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @01:08PM
(#34599050)
Where you are makes a big difference. 20 years ago I read about some 'passive house', and realized it was actually less insulated than the codes in Minnesota require - but it was in a mild climate so it was passive, while the more efficient houses in MN are not passive.
https://www.cse.org.uk/advice/advice-and-support/mechanical-...