Heart attacks on dramatic rise for 25-44 age group

Re:Heart attacks on dramatic rise for 25-44 age group by nyrulez on Sunday January 29, 2023 @01:29AM (#34565517)

Yes, that's definitely possible. All of this would be much easier to decipher if the studies went deeper into cohorts of who got the vaccination and where the heart attack delta is. So if you had 4 cohorts of people and noticed their heart attack delta: covid/no vaccine, no covid/no vaccine, covid/vaccine, no covid/vaccine, that itself would tell you a lot.

Because if no covid/vaccine is showing a much higher or similar delta as covid/*, that would be pretty worrisome. I think that seems to be missing in the given study.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Heart attacks on dramatic rise for 25-44 age group by steve1977 on Sunday January 29, 2023 @02:05AM (#34565664)

Can we reliably detect if someone was vaccinated but not exposed to the actual virus?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Heart attacks on dramatic rise for 25-44 age group by michilehr on Sunday January 29, 2023 @02:50AM (#34565869)

Yes. I did a test last year to check for antibodies generated through the vaccine and antibodies generated through an infection. Vaccine was positive, infection negative.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Heart attacks on dramatic rise for 25-44 age group by lostlogin on Sunday January 29, 2023 @04:37AM (#34566457)

Is the rest reliable?

“In participants that had COVID-19 and were tested one week after symptoms developed, antibody tests detected only 27% to 41% of infections. In week 2 after first symptoms, 64% to 79% of infections were detected, rising to 78% to 88% in week 3. Tests that specifically detected IgG or IgM antibodies were the most accurate and, when testing people from 21 days after first symptoms, they detected 93% of people with COVID-19. Tests gave false positive results for 1% of those without COVID-19.”

https://www.cochrane.org/CD013652/INFECTN_what-diagnostic-ac...

[ Parent | on HN ]