News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel discontinues pathfinder for RISC-V program by Foobar8568 on Friday January 27, 2023 @11:58AM (#34548353)
I have been burnt by the sockit board. I move away from wanting to learn fpga after all the bushit. All fgpa vendors are similar as far as I'm concerned.
Re:Intel discontinues pathfinder for RISC-V program by krasin on Friday January 27, 2023 @12:48PM (#34549245)
Open source FPGA toolchains begin to appear, mostly on the low-end for now. And because all FPGA vendors are doing such a terrible job for tooling, Yosys and friends are likely the future.
Re:Intel discontinues pathfinder for RISC-V program by FullyFunctional on Friday January 27, 2023 @01:06PM (#34549486)
Very true; Lattice Semi’s ECP5 is a fairly decent FPGA with very mature support from Yosys/nextpnr/trellis.

Xilinx’ Artix-7/Kintex-7 are much more powerful FPGAs and the support for those is getting to be pretty good (DDR3 support is steadily maturing)

It would be nice to see a vendor actually officially supporting these efforts. Maybe one day.

(Not to mention various open source FPGAs - actual chips - being developped)

Re:Intel discontinues pathfinder for RISC-V program by rowanG077 on Friday January 27, 2023 @01:43PM (#34549967)
Treat them as purely hardware vendors and go open source tooling. The tooling is infinitely superior from a ux point of view. There are still quite a bit of missing features but it is getting there.
Re:Intel discontinues pathfinder for RISC-V program by misnome on Friday January 27, 2023 @02:38PM (#34550693)
We've heard positive opinions of the Xilinx boards and tooling. At least, not having everything about the HLS tooling either changed or syntax deprecated every three months.
Re:Intel discontinues pathfinder for RISC-V program by bcrl on Friday January 27, 2023 @07:02PM (#34553503)
But Xilinx has the absolute worst SERDES interface. Microsemi's Polarfire was way easier to get 10G ethernet up and running on (hours vs weeks).