News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Contracts you should never sign by thwayunion on Friday January 27, 2023 @10:45AM (#34547305)
Serious question: is it even possible to get a well-paying dev position that doesn't have one or more of the clauses listed in the article?

Another consideration is whether the contract can be enforced and your legal recourse if the counter-party attempts to enforce an invalid contract clause. This is particularly true for noncompetes.

A better piece of advice than "never sign" is to simply find an employment lawyer and discuss the ramifications of the contract prior to signing.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by claytonjy on Friday January 27, 2023 @11:01AM (#34547502)
I have successfully negotiated my way out of non-competes and other onerous employment contract terms. Only at small- or medium-sized startups, though, not big tech. In general the bigger the company, the less willing legal is to play ball. I suspect going for rather senior roles helps, too.
Re:Contracts you should never sign by thwayunion on Friday January 27, 2023 @11:12AM (#34547622)
Non-competes are dog-eat-dog "fuck you" territory for me. I don't even bother negotiating. I happily sign non-competes, but will never sign a non-compete that's actually enforceable. If their lawyers want to lie to me about what's legal in my state, I'm happy to let them engage in unfair and deceptive behavior right up until there are actual damages.

More importantly, I would also happily fight them in court if it came to that (and retire on the triple damages).

I'm thinking of some of the other clauses:

1. "one-sided termination clause": Every contract in an at-will jurisdictions without a guaranteed exit bonus contains, implicitly or otherwise, a "one-sided termination clause". I have never seen a contract for "normal working stiffs" that contains an exit bonus, and I've only ever worked in at-will jurisdictions.

2. IP assignment

3. Confidentiality agreements with broad language

Re:Contracts you should never sign by TylerE on Friday January 27, 2023 @12:42PM (#34549124)
Very, very, bad idea. Never sign something you disagree with because you believe it to be unenforceable.
Re:Contracts you should never sign by toomuchtodo on Friday January 27, 2023 @12:56PM (#34549368)
I disagree. My employment attorney recently reviewed a "non compete non solicitation" doc for an engagement and said, "it's copied from LegalZoom and is so badly written it will be unenforcible in the jurisdiction and here is why." They earned their $300 for reviewing my employment docs (for reasons beyond this specific issue). When in doubt, seek counsel and follow their guidance.
Re:Contracts you should never sign by TylerE on Friday January 27, 2023 @01:01PM (#34549434)
That's...rather different. You actually consulted an attorney. 99.9% of the people trying this one weird trick do not, often to their great cost.
Re:Contracts you should never sign by sidewndr46 on Friday January 27, 2023 @01:57PM (#34550151)
How would you even function in the US? Just one time to get an apartment they had me sign an agreement stating I was not in the military, had never been in the military & would not join so long as I lived there. Keep in mind, I was subject to conscription at the time.

The whole thing is laughably unenforceable as well. They're trying to end run around federal law protecting members of the uniformed services. You can write any contract you want & have anyone you want sign it about. Doesn't mean anything, at all.

Also I'm pretty sure if I got called up to go to war, there is going to be someone in the DoD who can give me a little legal help in explaining to the landlord how hard they need to pound sand.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by TylerE on Friday January 27, 2023 @02:31PM (#34550614)
That’s a good example, but most contracts have language such as “if any clause of this contract is found to be invalid, the rest remains in force”.

So yea, in a case like that that part of the contract would be struck, but it isn’t a get out of jail free card for the entire contract.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by sidewndr46 on Friday January 27, 2023 @02:42PM (#34550742)
You're talking about "severability" in US contract law. The rest of the contract was either stupid (regulating my usage of the non-existent golf course) or just garden variety stuff (can't sublet, etc.).

The same company also just dropped off an "updated" contract a few months later and told me that I had to review it and sign it or move out by the end of the month. I obviously just ignored this.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by jameshart on Friday January 27, 2023 @03:21PM (#34551291)
Right, but in an employment contract you want that severability. If the company tries to enforce the non compete clause and it’s invalid, you don’t want that to invalidate their obligations with respect to your pension.
Re:Contracts you should never sign by pm24601 on Sunday January 29, 2023 @12:42PM (#34570523)
My experience with companies pulling DIY contract addendums out of their ass is that they forget severability clauses. Or that the contract starts falling apart because they have other sections which refer to the severed part which means those sections also fall apart. For example, a damages section that ends up exceeding state law.

DIY contracts are the best to sign because they are such a mess.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by telebell on Saturday January 28, 2023 @07:47AM (#34557139)
I’m a lawyer and a few years ago negotiated a “we own everything you make” clause in an agreement for a batch of engineers who were being hired at the same time. We couldn’t get the clause changed - as others have said, BigLaw drafted it, the employer didn’t want to change it - but we did get an email after back and forth that said they had no intention of enforcing that clause for stuff you make outside of work. So I sent that email to the engineers and they can hold onto it in case there’s an issue in the future.

Reasonable companies don’t want to get a reputation for litigating employment clauses like this. Sure, there are outliers, but nobody wants to be on the front page of HN for suing an engineer over a side hustle. Especially not in this labor market!

Side note: it was delightful to me that the engineers carefully read the agreement and one of them consulted their own lawyer. Most people don’t do that.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by listenallyall on Saturday January 28, 2023 @07:08PM (#34563379)
Are you a lawyer? Or do you have a lawyer review every contract you sign? Just curious how you are so confident a particular contract, or clause within, is unenforceable. Not saying you're wrong, but how do you know?
Re:Contracts you should never sign by thwayunion on Thursday February 02, 2023 @11:01AM (#34628424)
> Are you a lawyer?

No, and my posts are not legal advice.

> Or do you have a lawyer review every contract you sign?

Yes, and they provide me with legal advice specific to my situation.

> Just curious how you are so confident a particular contract, or clause within, is unenforceable. Not saying you're wrong, but how do you know?

MA statute is very clearly written and its courts don't have a reputation for fucking around with legislative intent.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by BeetleB on Friday January 27, 2023 @12:13PM (#34548612)
My (well known, big) company doesn't do non-competes. They do have the clause of not poaching employees for a year after you leave, though.

And I'm free to work on other stuff or have a side business. People in the company disagree on how much of that needs to be disclosed, though.

Re:Contracts you should never sign by weaksauce on Monday January 30, 2023 @07:23PM (#34588922)
in some states those clauses aren't enforceable like in california.