Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out of Work

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by unvx-n-banned on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:36PM (#34535229)

Is long covid what everyone is calling long term side effects from the experimental mRNA gene therapy that was mandated on the population? Or are we still not allowed to say those "conspiracy theories" outloud?

Guess we'll find out based on how quickly this comment is flagged/downvoted.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by RyanCavanaugh on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:40PM (#34535294)

"Am I wrong? If people show up to say I'm wrong, that only proves I'm right!"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by notahacker on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:43PM (#34535356)

Weird how people started getting these side effects from the "experimental mRNA gene therapy" several months before the vaccination programmes started...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by puffoflogic on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:44PM (#34535375)

If you don't have a source for that, you should put it back where it came from.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by digdugdirk on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:51PM (#34535534)

While I do realize I'm wasting time feeding the trolls, here you go. Pretty easy to do a simple google scholar search for "Long Covid" and sort by date.

https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3489

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by n42 on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:58PM (#34535684)

“Controversial opinion with no evidence presented in just enough of a noncommittal way to deflect responsibility for its presentation. Watch me get downvoted, that’ll prove me right!”

“Widely accepted take”

“Your inability to provide evidence proves the original take!”

This way of “arguing” has been carefully crafted to prevent any intellectual debate.

Not that I think it will help you, here is an article in Nature on long Covid published in December of 2020 before vaccines were widely distributed: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-01177-6

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by paranoidxprod on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:48PM (#34535482)

https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2815

5 months before the vaccine came out.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by ortusdux on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:50PM (#34535516)

Shouldn't your sentiment also apply to the parent comment as well?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by somewhereoutth on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:45PM (#34535389)

Unfortunately the conspiracy theories have directly led to 1000s of deaths, so yes flagging and downvoting is warranted.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:Long Covid Is Keeping Significant Numbers of People Out o... by s5300 on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:52PM (#34535542)

Oh no all of the Soylent I chugged over lockdown is making me reply to this comment

I guess I should’ve given up (insert linkin park hyperlink here) soy for lent!

[ Parent | on HN ]