News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We tried to run a social media site and it was awful by jermaustin1 on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @01:42PM (#34522389)
WordPress is as easy as websites get. My 70 year old father runs a handful of them. They are 1 click to install, and have a built in plugin system to add extra features.

Running WP is easy for the majority of users.

Re:We tried to run a social media site and it was awful by TylerE on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @01:51PM (#34522514)
Yes. Until gramps forgets to update and he gets owned by scriptkiddies...usually via a hole in one of those plugins.
Re:We tried to run a social media site and it was awful by jermaustin1 on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @01:58PM (#34522612)
He pays $40/mo for all of his sites, and included in that is hourly backups rolling for multiple days, security audits, automatic updates, and the ability to lock down logins to a specific IP.

In the 8 years of hosting with wordpress, he's been under constant automated attack, and never once has a site been compromised. I doubt that is because he is some super computer genius, and more likely its just that his host has a decent offering.

But point still stands, if a host allows you to click a button to launch a wordpress site, that is still easy to do.

Re:We tried to run a social media site and it was awful by Fuzzwah on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @03:12PM (#34523514)
The difference in what people think of as "running a website" is at play in this conversation.

Administering a website hosted by WordPress.com isn't the same level of difficulty as being an admin of a LAMP based website on bare metal.

Re:We tried to run a social media site and it was awful by TylerE on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @04:45PM (#34524602)
Or (from personal experience helping multiple friends) running Wordpress on a commodity cpanel host.