It's a score, not a fortune teller. It's for financial modeling, and only one thing of many that lenders look at.
The entire point of a credit card score is to predict the future.
Being bad at that because of inherent inaccuracies in their methodology is a problem.
>Being bad at that because of inherent inaccuracies in their methodology is a problem.
The parent poster already mentioned that it's "not a crystal ball". It doesn't have to be perfect. Sure, there are some edge cases where it fails, but if it works 99% then it's good enough. On the flip side, do you really want a minority report like system that can predict your future credit with 100% accuracy?
They don’t even do a very good job of what’s intended as people can literally have an 800 score the week before declaring bankruptcy.