Really? Often, the top links are AI generated spam that, while somewhat relevant to whatever you searched for, sounds like it was written by a high school student trying to pad the word count for a few pages.

It doesn't sound like you're disagreeing.

Yes, Google search results are worse than they were in it's height.

Google front page is a whale of a target. At no point has there been more sophisticated attacks for people trying to hit front page with low-quality content. The position you parent comment took is that Google of today is better at resisting those attacks, and no one version of Google would provide as good results on today's internet.

I believe Google is fundamentally failing at it's mission of "organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful" and it's earlier value of "Don't be evil". That's not to say that Google Search isn't better at searching today's internet than any other iteration of Google Search would have been.

>and it's earlier value of "Don't be evil".

What do you mean? It's still part of their current values.

https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct/

esp. for anything relatively technical. the pages look like they copied and pasted someone else's documentation together.

at this point it's almost always ignore the first 3 hits and go straight to stackoverflow or reddit, or something that's plainly obviously related like python.org documentation.

I've noticed so many domain names are spammy with associated subdomain spam. I'm impressed they manage to get to the front page of Google.

Maybe this is confirmation bias since I have seen a multitude of blogs and threads popping up around this topic but I have clicked the "Page 2" button on Google multiple times this month. I don't think I have to add anything to make that an argument.