Re:Meet “Claude”: Anthropic’s Rival to ChatGPT
by Raphaellll on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @04:14AM
(#34424846)
There is a paper?
Re:Meet “Claude”: Anthropic’s Rival to ChatGPT
by zone411 on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @04:17AM
(#34424863)
The grandparent is probably talking about the InstructGPT paper? But I don't remember seeing a preference for longer responses in that paper.
Re:Meet “Claude”: Anthropic’s Rival to ChatGPT
by astrange on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @04:25AM
(#34424899)
I meant the blog post.
https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
> The model is often excessively verbose and overuses certain phrases, such as restating that it’s a language model trained by OpenAI. These issues arise from biases in the training data (trainers prefer longer answers that look more comprehensive) and well-known over-optimization issues.12
> Stiennon, Nisan, et al. “Learning to summarize with human feedback.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020): 3008-3021. ↩
> Gao, Leo, John Schulman, and Jacob Hilton. “Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10760 (2022). ↩
Re:Meet “Claude”: Anthropic’s Rival to ChatGPT
by s-macke on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @05:14AM
(#34425141)
I have read in a Deepmind Blog post, that language model AIs gives more reliable and correct answers, if it is forced into some Chain-of-thought prompt. Especially for questions, which involve math.
Something like "Think about it first, before you give the answer". Could it be that ChatGPT is being forced in this direction?
Long answers from GPT are unusually obnoxious because of a way the decoder works; it emits words with a much more constant rate of perplexity than human text does (this is how GPT-vs-human detectors work) which makes it sound stuffy and monotone.