Re:Extreme 'Rogue Wave' in the North Pacific Confirmed as Mo...
by worik on Thursday January 12, 2023 @03:21PM
(#34359744)
> Aircraft carriers are gigantic and are designed to be stable
The ocean is bigger.
It is only a matter of time until one is lost
The ocean is the boss of sailors, a loving but harsh mistress.
Re:Extreme 'Rogue Wave' in the North Pacific Confirmed as Mo...
by MarkMarine on Thursday January 12, 2023 @03:27PM
(#34359811)
There have been plenty of aircraft carriers sunk, not sure what your point is.
Re:Extreme 'Rogue Wave' in the North Pacific Confirmed as Mo...
by TylerE on Thursday January 12, 2023 @03:59PM
(#34360170)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_Cobra
3 destroyers sank, with almost 1000 lives lost, and virtually every ship in the fleet took enough damage to at least force a port visit, if not a major repair/refit.
Re:Extreme 'Rogue Wave' in the North Pacific Confirmed as Mo...
by MarkMarine on Thursday January 12, 2023 @04:24PM
(#34360438)
Not positive how this got misconstrued, but I'm not saying an aircraft carrier is unsinkable. I'm saying it's designed not to pitch and roll as much as a say a destroyer or frigate. That's it.
For fixed wing jets that need to land on deck… even if you ignored the wind that goes along with these conditions, I think recovering aircraft would be too great a risk. That does bring up the wind and visibility that (almost always) goes along with these extreme sea states, which would be probably just as hazardous as the deck pitching about to flight ops.
For basically everything else, I think the naval systems work just fine in bad weather.
In regards to rogue waves, an 85 foot wave would put green water on the flight deck of the carrier I was on, something that would be difficult to imagine for me. Aircraft on the flight deck are chained down with multiple chains, each of the chains having the strength to hold the entire aircraft down, so I can’t imagine losing aircraft, but flooding the planes with sea water probably wouldn’t be good for them.