News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Museums with CC0 Collections. Parent comment

Re:Museums with CC0 Collections by acabal on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @01:52PM (#34329601)
In the US, copyright status is determined by when something was published, not how old it is. The two are not related. That's how we get stupid things like the University of California and the Mark Twain Foundation claiming a copyright on his autobiography, written circa 1909, until 2047 - 137 years after his death.[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobiography_of_Mark_Twain#Ma...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Museums with CC0 Collections by sudobash1 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @02:00PM (#34329724)
So if I found an amateur painting that was centuries old in an attic somewhere, and posted a scan of it on my blog, I would then be the copyright holder of that painting? That feels so wrong.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Museums with CC0 Collections by boppo1 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:30PM (#34331039)
No, you would be the copyright holder of your photograph.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Museums with CC0 Collections by sudobash1 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:01PM (#34331435)
My understanding of copyright rulings in the US (eg see Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. above) is that a faithful photograph of a painting is not considered "original". Therefore, if I do not have the copyright to the painting, neither would I have copyright over the photo.
[ Parent | on HN ]