Rocket mortgage fraudulantly tanked our credit score and refused to fix it. The other bank's underwriting department looked at it, shrugged, and honored the mortgage office's request for an override to give us the best available rate.
IMO, Credit ratings are theater.
I know there are contrived ways I could have killed the value of the vehicle before the loan was done and they couldn't recoup it, but like, come on. My credit report was BLANK. It was never needed in the first place.
I haven't seen what happens at 10 years, but there's definitely an effect after about a year; mine dropped 50 points, which isn't really tanking, but could switch you into a different risk category depending on where you started. Finishing up my car payments didn't help either.
If you actually want to get the score that lenders use, experian.com will give you your FICO 8 score. This score considers all accounts open the same until they have been closed for 10 years.
> The FICO® Score pulled on [date] is the FICO® Score 8 based on Experian data, and is the same score that [name of institution] uses, along with other information, to manage your account.
Another says:
> The score provided here is FICO® Score 8, which is based on TransUnion® data and may differ from other FICO® Scores. Variations may also occur when your score is based on data from another consumer reporting agency or calculated at a different time. [name of institution] and other lenders may use different scores and other information in credit decisions.
I'm not going to intentionally interact with Experian directly, unless I have to, so not going to compare there. From what I recall, when I last opened a loan and they disclosed the scores, they were within spitting distance of what I was seeing from my banks at the time.
Now maybe FICO 8 score means something different than FICO Score 8; these guys like to be deceiving, and maybe some banks give the VantageScore, but mine seem to give a FICO Score 8.
Anecdotally, neither me nor my partner have a credit score. I know several people where I’m living that are permanent renters/get owner financed loans, buy used cars with cash (or are simply given old cars, or don’t have a car at all).
I did a superficial search and found some census data (https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/cps/cp...) but I have no idea how to read it.
Edit: Looks like my suspicions have some merit:
> 22% of Americans do not have a credit score. Half of this percentage has a stale credit score that makes it impossible to generate a valid FICO score while the other half do not have any credit file with any of the three credit bureaus—Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion.
> 18% of Americans have credit scores that fall in the 580-669 range of “fair.” those in the fair range are considered sub-prime and have lower chances of qualifying for a loan or getting better interest rates.
I paid off my mortgage almost 15 years ago. I have zero debt, no car loans or anything, and pay off my credit cards in full every month. My credit lines are barely utilized (single digit percentage.) My score seems to vary from 790 to 810.
If you have no debt and pay cash as you go for your expenses, you will eventually drop because the credit bureaus will have no recent data to compute a score.
Maybe you are indeed an “average consumer” (whatever that means) but if you are, then the credit system is heavily skewed in your favor, with many “non-average consumers” falling by the wayside.
Only when it drops off your report, which is 10 years after you pay it off.
If you were so concerned about having a line of credit on your record then open up a credit card and don't use it, no reason to pay thousands of dollars in interest to avoid an abstract fear of "tanking your credit score."
>it really sucks for the average consumer, yet there is no actual change coming
I am an average consumer. The credit system is great for me! I'm able to demonstrate my responsibility and as a result I'm able to obtain a large amount of credit products at very low cost as well as pay less for insurance. I guess you can argue that the government should be providing this service rather than private companies or there should be more regulations around security, but the system only "really sucks" for people who take out loans and don't repay them.