News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The creator economy: the top 1% and everyone else. Parent comment

Re:The creator economy: the top 1% and everyone else by wakana on Saturday January 07, 2023 @11:35AM (#34289653)
I am not as comfortable having a back and forth on substack than I am on HN. I am not sure as to why people who use tools like [1], [2], [3], [4] have to declare as such that the parts of the content may have been edited with help from computer tools if the end goal of conveying the information has been satisfactorily achieved. This seems like a rehashing of the "AI generated art is not real art" debate [5] again.

[1] https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B [2] https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/bloom [3] https://www.jasper.ai/ [4] https://openai.com/api/ [5] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The creator economy: the top 1% and everyone else by NetOpWibby on Saturday January 07, 2023 @11:55AM (#34289899)
We're on HN now.

Why have you deleted every comment on your post mentioning GPT-3? There were at least 4 or 5 comments mentioning it and you've deleted every one.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The creator economy: the top 1% and everyone else by wakana on Saturday January 07, 2023 @12:01PM (#34289984)
I mentioned, I am not as comfortable having a back and forth on substack than I am on HN. That is why I deleted the comments on substack, as they were not relevant to LLMs (or "GPT-3" as you like to call them)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The creator economy: the top 1% and everyone else by NetOpWibby on Saturday January 07, 2023 @12:08PM (#34290085)
> as you like to call them

Just using the same language as the deleted comments.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The creator economy: the top 1% and everyone else by ops on Saturday January 07, 2023 @02:10PM (#34291485)
Not sure about the others, but for [4], it's in their ToS:

https://openai.com/api/policies/sharing-publication/#content...

[ Parent | on HN ]