Re:The size of an empire cannot be larger than 1 month of tr...
by zopa on Friday January 06, 2023 @11:20AM
(#34276589)
All empires collapse eventually.
Re:The size of an empire cannot be larger than 1 month of tr...
by pessimizer on Friday January 06, 2023 @11:49AM
(#34277130)
Past performance isn't a guarantee of future results. With modern technology, the next empire will never collapse.
Re:The size of an empire cannot be larger than 1 month of tr...
by gsich on Friday January 06, 2023 @12:28PM
(#34277833)
Until it does.
Re:The size of an empire cannot be larger than 1 month of tr...
by csomar on Friday January 06, 2023 @12:46PM
(#34278153)
The heat death will guarantee the collapse of all and any empire.
Re:The size of an empire cannot be larger than 1 month of tr...
by meatyloafy on Friday January 06, 2023 @12:27PM
(#34277811)
All except the last.
Re:The size of an empire cannot be larger than 1 month of tr...
by AnimalMuppet on Friday January 06, 2023 @11:25AM
(#34276703)
OK, but England maintained Australia for centuries. Spain maintained the New World for centuries. I'm not sure "eventually collapsed" is proof that "it didn't work".
I mean, the Soviet Union eventually collapsed, and that wasn't because of communication delays. Everything eventually collapses. But "stood for centuries, despite the communication delays" kind of disproves the hypothesis. (Or if it doesn't, given the things that collapse after centuries without the communication delays, it means the hypothesis has no predictive power.)
Re:The size of an empire cannot be larger than 1 month of tr...
by readthenotes1 on Friday January 06, 2023 @11:38AM
(#34276936)
The same argument could be made for Great Britain and the United States as well since the colonies were a part of GB for centuries.
I think the same argument for Canada applies to Australia: there must be a critical mass of well weaponed insurgents before the time delay makes too much of a difference.
Collapsed eventually.
Collapsed immediately upon his death.