In the U.S. withdrawing at another bank will frequently incur a few twice, once from your institution and once from the disbursing one, unless you are on a product which specifically makes a selling point out of reimbursing you for ATM fees.
This is not simply a matter of “greed”; it is also a policy choice made by society as to who pays for bank services and where. Different equilibria prevail in different places, partly anchored on historical practice and partly in response to the usual factors which shape public policy.
Fair enough, but I was still shocked by it. I know Japan's "checkerboard" ATM schedule, but (except for normal fees charged for withdrawing money from your savings account) I didn't really expect banks to double-charge you for domestic transactions.
DKB and ING Diba require 12€/year for a giro card, and either "aktivstatus" (DKB) or 50€ minimum for free withdrawals.
However ATM withdrawals on a bank different than yours usually has some kind of fee (depending on the bank, I usually pay between €0,60 to €1,50, for debit withdrawals, credit has bank fees for ATM use and a fee for using credit). Usually if you withdraw €200 or more it's free, but that's entirely dependent on your bank.
That network just so happens to encompass every bank operating in the country.
This isn't clear to me. Is it for interbank transactions or is this includes intrabank transactions? It's confusing for me since that nearly all banks here have free intra- and interbank withdrawal*. Are US banks really that greedy?
* It may be indirectly charged by lower interest rates, I'm not sure, but there's no direct fees collected.
Edit: wow, US banks are greedy. This is the first time that I've heard about domestic own-bank fees (separate from ATM operators' fees) for inquiring (not even withdrawing) your account. Silver lining is that intrabank transactions are still free, which is okay I guess but but definitely weird for me.