So you hold the homogeneity of your original post-European community as evidence of moral impropriety--do you believe this principle should be universally applied to all peoples of the world, or are whites the only ones where homogeneity is "a problem"?

I have no desire to retread the 101 of how "white" cannot be treated as logically equivalent to other racial labels. Go do some reading on the subject. A good place to start is trying to enumerate exactly what heritages count as white, and how that has changed over time.

I didn't ask you whether or not your community was "racist". I'm sure they were, as are the majority of people on earth outside of progressive urban areas in western first-world countries. I asked you if ethnic homogeneity is morally improper in any communities besides post-European white people.

You're past my line with ascribing what I think and who from in a way that's literally just you ranting your imagination at me. You have no idea my mind on any of these things based on our conversation thus far.

Talk about the self report...

(Editing: as far as "ascribing what you think", the only things I've ascribed to what you think that you think that ethnic homogeneity in post-European white population is morally improper, which is exceedingly clear from the phrasing of the first comment you posted when you called it a "problem", and that you believe your community was racist, which is clear from the second comment you posted.)

Sure buddy.

The Kenyan soccer team doesn't have any white players. Are they racist?

This is clearly from someone who hasn't experience other cultures. White, black, asian, latino labels were all made up around 1700-1800s and all have been argued who's included all over the world even now, is a human created concept that has changed over time. Like most Americans your clearly making up for any biases of an all white upbringing and systemic racist past by being anti-white now.