Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by naveen99 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @01:47PM
(#34199394)
It’s turtles. JPMorgan is publicly traded. The renter can just buy as many shares of it as he wants and pretend it’s his home equity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by TaylorAlexander on Saturday December 31, 2022 @01:49PM
(#34199412)
This is nonsense. 99.99% of renters can’t buy enough JPMorgan to make a difference. They don’t have the money and that’s why they’re renting.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by darth_avocado on Saturday December 31, 2022 @01:52PM
(#34199448)
But if tomorrow JPM decides to invest like Kathy Wood and lose all the money, the renters will be without home equity and the JPM equity.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by ramesh31 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @01:53PM
(#34199454)
> It’s turtles. JPMorgan is publicly traded. The renter can just buy as many shares of it as he wants and pretend it’s his home equity.
Try asking your brokerage for $400,000 of margin at 5% on a $20,000 account and see what they say.
There's no financial instrument even remotely close to what a 30 year mortgage is for the average individual.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by naveen99 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @02:55PM
(#34200085)
I believe you can get higher leverage on treasury bonds at your broker. My 1 year treasury bonds use less than 2% margin.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by roflyear on Saturday December 31, 2022 @04:52PM
(#34201144)
What's the rate? You're not getting free money.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by naveen99 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @05:37PM
(#34201479)
It’s 1% above what you make on the treasury. Less than mortgage rates for sure, and if interest rates drop it might become free money, of course if interest rates go up you are swimming naked.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by roflyear on Monday January 02, 2023 @07:53PM
(#34226058)
I suppose, but can't really beat 2.5% on a house (remember, if you're living there, you're not paying rent.. hopefully!)
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by speakfreely on Saturday December 31, 2022 @02:43PM
(#34199952)
Good luck getting 95% leverage to buy $500k worth of JP Morgan stock.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by naveen99 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @02:53PM
(#34200064)
Equity is the part of the mortgage paid off (unleveraged value in the house).
[dead]
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by roflyear on Saturday December 31, 2022 @04:50PM
(#34201135)
Then everyone would have to rent.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by throwaway5959 on Sunday January 01, 2023 @03:17AM
(#34204616)
Not if prices fell. And they’d save a small fortune in interest over the life of the loan.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by roflyear on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:43PM
(#34235887)
A fortune? I'll be paying a little more than $100k over the life of my 30y mortgage. I think that is very fair for the amount I borrowed (3x that...)
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by throwaway5959 on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @10:45PM
(#34241755)
What was the interest rate?
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by speakfreely on Saturday December 31, 2022 @06:31PM
(#34201838)
> We should bright back 50% down, five year mortgages and cut the rest of the stuff out.
Well, in that case, good luck convincing the majority of the population to adopt a policy that will catastrophically crash their net worth. Government involvement in mortgages is what keeps our society civil at this point.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by seanp2k2 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @03:30PM
(#34200391)
How much of that profit is passed on to shareholders vs benefitting land owners directly? There’s also the matter of not being able to live in those shares, having to still pay rent, still pay massively inflated property taxes yourself…