News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by the_gastropod on Saturday December 31, 2022 @01:00PM (#34198901)
I have been a renter my entire adult life, and over the decades have plowed several hundred thousand dollars into the pockets of the various landlords I’ve rented from. The total maintenance done during all my tenancy is: 1. A broken seal on a washing machine was replaced 2. A leaky toilet was repaired 3. A broken kitchen drawer was replaced

I don’t believe my case is particularly uncommon. In ~20 years of renting, ~$500k of rent paid, the total maintenance done on the units I’ve rented probably cost under $100. Toss in the most expensive paint and cleaning regimen after I’ve vacated, and let’s call it a cool $1,000. If the value landlords are providing is “maintaining properties”, their margins here are colossal.

Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by metadat on Saturday December 31, 2022 @01:25PM (#34199155)
Agree 100%, the margins tend to favor the owner. It varies by property, ome are much higher maintenance.

My point is simply that these things don't take care of themselves and need to be managed one way or another.

Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by eulers_secret on Saturday December 31, 2022 @02:36PM (#34199878)
Depends on how you rent. I went through and calculated my total housing expenses for the last 15 years- they’re about $120,000; in my area that’s a (minimal) down payment. It’s less than a year of salary.

I’ve had all appliances replaced, a new roof (and a new ceiling when this leaked), the parking lot resurfaced twice, and a new water heater, endless bits and bobs (sink disposal, all new light switches, door knobs, fully new shower enclosure and faucets). Maintenance shovels snow, cleans up leaves, and de-ices. I have never mowed a lawn, shoveled snow nor done any physical labor at all- I’m still in good shape, there’s a gym and pool on premises.

My apartment is small, that’s why it’s inexpensive. But I won’t have kids and don’t need >1 bedroom. Already married for the whole time as well. Depends on how one wants to live their life.

Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by spacemadness on Saturday December 31, 2022 @03:13PM (#34200275)
I think we’re all just completely forgetting that rent price is a function of where you live. Just throwing out numbers like this isn’t helpful.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by the_gastropod on Friday January 13, 2023 @10:58AM (#34369564)
Yea, exactly. My $500k number was primarily for rent in NYC. $120k over 15 years averages $666/mo—an unlikely situation in NY, SF, etc.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by quesera on Saturday December 31, 2022 @03:24PM (#34200355)
Major expenses you're not including, though:

  - Property taxes
  - Hazard insurance
  - Debt service
  - Some utilities (water, trash, sometimes even heat, depending on your rental agreement)
  - Maintenance and repair of exterior and common spaces
  - Repairs and updates after you move out, and before you move in (assuming you have not been in the same apartment for 20 years)
Yes of course you're paying for these things via rent. But the owner's margin is probably much smaller than your math would imply.

The value provided to you in the owner's margin includes:

  - Flexibility of movement. Want to move at the end of your lease? No problem. (Need to sell to move? That will cost you 6% of the property sale price!)
  - The security of knowing that you will never be hit by surprise maintenance costs. $30K for a new roof? Never going to be your problem.
  - The ability to live where you want to! In many locations, there are no apartment-equivalent units for sale.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by quartesixte on Saturday December 31, 2022 @07:04PM (#34202094)
You, yourself, might not have had any maintenance required, but you're also somewhat subsidizing anyone else in your complex who might.

In exchange for a fraction of what the real maintenance cost of a large repair will be, you get peace of mind that you will never be actually responsible for fixing it or footing the whole bill. The landlord gets to collect profits but one day will have to fix a major problem (and this is guaranteed -- houses wear down over time) that will require them to dip into said profits.

And then you have risk. There are levels of damage that will render the unit or units uninhabitable, wiping out possible years if not decades of gains. The margin is to (theoretically) protect against that.

Not saying this is the perfect system, and definitely greed has inflated these margins while reducing the value of services rendered, but this is the core idea behind it.