News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I'm still using Python by travisgriggs on Friday December 30, 2022 @07:25PM (#34191844)
"A lot of batteries included" cannot be repeated enough. This is huge. Some languages you have to write your own. But the flip is also true. Take Node. For function X, there are 100 ill named "add ons" of variable quality and repute. Discoverability is a nightmare. Which-to-use in your mashup leads to paralysis analysis. I use a handful of libraries for some pretty large Python apps, but for so much of the basics, it's all in there. The quality and documentation vary a little, but the similarity/consistency is much better than you find in the wild. Even in Elixir (a much smaller universe than Node/JS), I experience this "15 poorly named packages that do the same thing in different ways".
Re:Why I'm still using Python by jolux on Friday December 30, 2022 @10:09PM (#34193109)
Which Elixir libraries do you think should be in the stdlib that aren’t?
Re:Why I'm still using Python by sodapopcan on Friday December 30, 2022 @11:16PM (#34193501)
I haven't found that in Elixir... I often find one of two that haven't been updated in a couple of years but still work just fine because the Elixir language itself doesn't change much.

It may depend on what types of libs you're looking for, of course. It's definitely missing a lot of stuff.

Re:Why I'm still using Python by at_a_remove on Saturday December 31, 2022 @01:37AM (#34194245)
* * *
Re:Why I'm still using Python by otabdeveloper4 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @04:40AM (#34194984)
Wait until you have to upgrade and update your Node application a year later.
Re:Why I'm still using Python by newswasboring on Saturday December 31, 2022 @05:07AM (#34195114)
I am not a JS person so I dont know, but in the jungle of add ons I wonder why there isn't a project which provides a stdlib like package for JS. Is it because for JS you want to install minimal libs?