> The bigger revelation was that the Democrats and Twitter conspired to not only silence political opponents running for office

Except that that didn't happen.

> but a sitting president that didn't actually violate any of the rules.

Are we even on the same planet?

> This is total government corruption and the real threat to our Democracy.

Unlike, say, encouraging/organizing an insurrection. Denying election results?

Really, what's in it for you to stick to this in light of all of the actual evidence, rather than the non-revelations from Twitter?

Amazing the amount of evidence you choose to ignore. Its almost like you've been psy-op'd by the media. Do you get all your information from "progressive" sources, because the right is all-far right? Thats like believing what you touch with your left hand, but ignoring anything you touch with your right, because you don't want to.

I saw a senator taking about Jan 6@US Capital a few days ago. He was talking about the violence, and the 5 people who died there. Please find a list of the 5 people.

- Ashli Babbitt

- Kevin D. Greeson

- Rosanne Boyland

- Benjamin Philips

- Officer Brian D. Sicknick

I think you managed to find your way onto the wrong website somehow. Please take your conspiracy nonsense somewhere else, thank you.

Nice, instead of considering the possibility and doing a 10sec goggle search, you brand me a conspiracy nut. And invite me to leave. This response could be characterized as promoting division.

Avoiding critical thinking is a serious problem in todays society. Instead of considering the possibility and perhaps expending a trivial amount of mental effort, you accept what you've been spoon-fed as fact.

I find this humorous as your profile says your company performs "Due Diligence" for other companies.

Yes, I'm inviting you to leave. There are plenty of websites where you can feel warm and cozy with idiocy like this but I would much prefer it if HN did not go in that direction.

If you seriously believe nobody died on Jan. 6th last year and that everybody that does not readily agree with your nutty conclusions must be psy-op'd then you have problems. But I'd prefer them to stay your problems and not to spill over into this community.

I choose to decline your offer.

You can read all about it right here: https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC&RulesFullRe...

>I saw a senator taking about Jan 6@US Capital a few days ago. He was talking about the violence, and the 5 people who died there. Please find a list of the 5 people.

Ummm...ok?

- Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as rioters tried to breach the House chamber.

- Kevin D. Greeson died of a heart attack, collapsing on the sidewalk west of the Capitol on Jan. 6.

- Rosanne Boyland appeared to have been crushed in a stampede of fellow rioters as they surged against the police.

- Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke.

- Officer Brian D. Sicknick of the Capitol Police, who was attacked by the mob, died on Jan. 7.

Any other low-IQ questions you would like easy-to-find answers to?

> a sitting president that didn't actually violate any of the rules.

Oh come on. I read the news, watched TV. This directly contradicts what I saw and read.

Are you a Russian propaganda account?