Re:Lora: Field Testing Antennas
by womod on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @03:13PM
(#34085792)
Antenna type and design can make all the difference in the world with regards to performance. Even plain-old 2.4GHz or 5GHz WiFi can work great over large distances provided that you use a parabolic reflector, yagi, log-periodic, etc. Microwave linking is all the rage nowadays, with WISPs popping up all over the place and large commercial operators using microwave links as backhaul between internet-connected sites (usually cell tower sites). But LoRa is still really awesome for low-bandwidth data with minimal antenna considerations, and having it be such a convenient standalone package with some of the boards available is just icing on the cake.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lora: Field Testing Antennas
by steve_adams_86 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @04:56PM
(#34086911)
Do you recommend any resources in particular for learning more about improving WiFi range and reliability, or should I just google some of those terms?
I briefly dug into it but had the sense that it might be a bit over my head. Iām not great with hardware ā I just goof around with it a bit and make fun stuff for hobbies. Making WiFi work better would be really useful for some things, though.
Re:Lora: Field Testing Antennas
by BenjiWiebe on Thursday December 22, 2022 @02:36AM
(#34090834)
Those are all directional antennas, for when your client is at a fixed predictable location.