Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by jonasdegendt on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @03:22AM
(#34078059)
Most bottled mineral water is just filtered tap water with some different minerals added to give it flavor.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by Gud on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @03:39AM
(#34078153)
Tap water is vastly different depending on where it is sourced. In my experience, most countries have pretty bad tap water.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by HPsquared on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @04:08AM
(#34078324)
After a few rounds of filtration it's all going to be the same.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by Reason077 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @04:09AM
(#34078333)
But if you carefully filter and re-mineralise it before bottling, you can turn it into more or less the same product anywhere.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by Gud on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @02:30PM
(#34236713)
Not really talking about bottling- in Scandinavia their tap water is better than most bottled water.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by iamacyborg on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @04:29AM
(#34078467)
I still think about how good Vancouver tap water is compared to the stuff we get in London.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by Reason077 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @06:56AM
(#34079491)
London tap water varies a lot in different parts of London. When I used to live in North-West London it was very hard (ie: full of minerals) so you'd constantly be cleaning the limescale gunk out of your shower, off your taps, etc. And I also remember it smelling noticeably "chlorinated" at times. Now I live in East London (E14) and it seems much softer - we get a bit of limescale but nothing like it was at my old place, and no pool-water smells.
But anyway, I think anywhere in London, so long as you run it through a filter (ie: Brita filter) and chill it, it tastes more or less as good as any bottled water.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by iamacyborg on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @09:54AM
(#34081456)
Yeah I’ve never thought London water was bad, but Vancouver water tasted amazing.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by donatj on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @06:18AM
(#34079209)
I would say it varies pretty widely on a much smaller than country level, moreso by source. Water from an aquifer almost always tastes much better than water from a river.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by wongarsu on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @04:38AM
(#34078524)
This varies by market. In the US, they just bottle tap water. In Europe this is really unusual, bottled water uses their own wells with different requirements and regulations. For example a stable mineral concentration and taste is very important for mineral water, but of secondary concern for tap water. Also tap water might come from surface water (rivers etc) while mineral water doesn't.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by KptMarchewa on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @05:27AM
(#34078880)
In Poland, there's "mineral water" where it needs to fulfill those requirements, and "spring water" that is basically bottled tap water. The first one costs like 0,5$ for 1,5L , while second one can be bought for as low as 0,2$.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by Semaphor on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @06:21AM
(#34079219)
Germany has mineral water and table water. Table water is the bottled tap water.
Though where I live, even table water would be better than unfiltered tap water. Not because of health concerns (I actually had my tap water lab tested as the building is from the 60s), but because of limescale in the kettle and disgust on my tastebuds ;)
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by RajT88 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @10:39AM
(#34082068)
Does the preferences for the qualities bottled water in Germany have any intersection with the history of public springs emitting carbonated mineral water?
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by Semaphor on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @10:56AM
(#34082319)
I have no idea, but I also prefer uncarbonated water ;)
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by wongarsu on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @03:36PM
(#34086071)
You mean if everyone else's preference for flat water is linked to their springs emitting flat water?
After the world seems to be in agreement that CocaCola and most lemonades are best served carbonated. But for water there's this weird schizm over carbonation.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B
by hashhar on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @04:57AM
(#34078667)
Tom Scott did a video about bottled-water, tap-water and mineral-water regarding this - see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD79NZroV88
It's interesting because the correct answer is that each country/region has different expectations from bottled water, mineral water.
As for avoiding bags I have two wicker baskets like this https://www.amazon.de/-/en/gp/product/B009BMXLLI/ which means I can avoid shopping bags and they are actually quite convenient for carrying.
Tap water is luckily very drinkable in Germany (rumor has it that Coca-Cola company bottles it and sells it under their 'Bonaqua' brand).
However, there is so much out of our control with plastics that require regulation. Just think of the packaging.