News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by saiya-jin on Monday December 19, 2022 @05:23PM (#34058604)
You didn't refute parent's main points at all, saying 'this is by law and contracts' just confirms his statements about bigger problems within society. If firemen let someone's house burn while the owner begs them for help, its something wrong on very basic moral level, and no matter of lawyering around is changing that.

Parent summarized well why people like me would never want to spend their lives or raise kids in places like US although we like visiting there, not when I can see in (some parts) of Europe how modern society should work as 1 unit, taking care and helping the weak because its simply the right fucking moral thing to do. It is in some aspects Star Trekkish utopia that actually works long term and improves lives of everybody involved.

Yes it costs money, almost nobody here has comparable US wages, but what are those numbers for when 1 serious visit to emergency can financially wipe out poorer families and good luck sending few kids to university, which are both basically no-topics here. Suddenly that million or two in the bank account seem more like necessary minimal backup rather than actually free usable money. And how many US families actually have those numbers sitting around, its rather mortgages left and right.

The amount of constant backstage stress for endless stream of regular blue and also white collar joes this removes is significant but hard to measure in easy-to-present numbers. I tend to call it one very important part of quality of life.

Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by twblalock on Monday December 19, 2022 @05:58PM (#34059012)
What's wrong on a moral level about this story is that the homeowners refused to pay for the fire department, decided to live on unincorporated land, and then expected the firemen to risk their lives to save property -- not to save lives, just to save property.

We can't have a functioning society if people who opt out of paying for it demand to benefit from it anyway. If people could get away with that, nobody would pay for the fire department and it wouldn't exist. By caving in this situation, the fire department would have signaled to everyone else that it's ok to not pay.

Maybe the tax that supports the fire department ought to be mandatory? Sure, that is how it works almost everywhere in the US. People who live in places where that is not the case are doing so on purpose, and they would vote against changing it.

Want to live in the middle of nowhere and depend on the government for little or nothing? Go for it, but don't complain when you want the government's help. Want to live in a city with a lot of government services? You can do that too. At least people have a choice.

Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by hypertele-Xii on Monday December 19, 2022 @07:08PM (#34059715)
> We can't have a functioning society if people who opt out of paying for it demand to benefit from it anyway.

We clearly can. Why can't you?

Over here, we help first, figure out who owes who later. In America, first you gotta figure out who's paying, then you get help.

Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by ekianjo on Monday December 19, 2022 @07:19PM (#34059809)
Taxes is still paying.
Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by abduhl on Monday December 19, 2022 @07:59PM (#34060139)
In the last century you (as in “you over there,” not you) made Iceland default on its loans rather than help them out causing them to suffer both as a country and as a people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932011_Icelandic_fi...

In the last decade you failed to offer help to hundreds of thousands of refugees because nobody could figure out who owed who. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_European_migrant_crisis

In the last year you failed to aid Ukraine in their war against Russia, failing to even provide weapons that you’d agreed to provide (but only agreeing after terms had been reached to make sure you got paid something). https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/16/ukraine-slams-germany-for-fa...

In the last month you failed to provide public transportation because you couldn’t agree on wages. https://www.wantedinrome.com/news/italy-national-general-str...

And that’s just on the continent in the last 20 years. If we were to go back to say around 1945 I’m sure we could find a couple more instances of Europeans being not so helpful.

Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by LadyCailin on Monday December 19, 2022 @09:26PM (#34060777)
I think it’s fair to compare only intranational affairs with other intranational affairs, as correct as you may be to point out the shortcomings. But these are apples to orange comparisons.

The public transit point is fair, but my understanding is that that is due to the right wing government, which is also the root problem in America.

Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by abduhl on Monday December 19, 2022 @11:24PM (#34061521)
France will have a second public transportation strike over wages shortly. https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/french...

Not helping someone until you figure out who’s paying is a way of life for Europeans.

Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by dang on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @04:35PM (#34072943)
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Did Insurance Fire Brigades let uninsured buildings burn? by dang on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @04:35PM (#34072941)
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html