Argument is invalid.
This is absolutely not doxxing.
Pull the other one.
Pretty much every platform (including Twitter) considers that to be doxxing.
You don't get to make up your own definitions for words.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Uxwbo7bhebMnLrpn8
(for the bystanders: there is no included letter or note, just this unsolicited package with no explaination and no known-to-me sender)
This conversation: 12-18
Sent: 12-18
Origin: anonymous fulfillment service
https://branchwarehousing.com/
So you have uncovered some never-was-covered public data from my full-real-name-middle-initial-and-all handle, and proved that some people out there are willing to mis-use public data, and that you are one of them, and I am not.
Strange point to want to make.
I wonder if HN has any sort of official stance on that sort of action @dang ?
99% of a dox is taking public information from obscure sources and making it easily accessible in one place. Doxxing can be sharing public information about someone without their permission. Being public doesn't make it not doxxing.