News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by lettergram on Friday December 16, 2022 @11:08PM (#34024533)
In an earlier release they also mention regular meetings (weekly?). That was not the only guy being contacted by the FBI either.

Regardless, while you may call this “underwhelming” it’s actually hard proof of illegal activity. The FBI cannot censor people, period. That’s fascism and illegal in the US, per multiple Supreme Court rulings.

This effectively gives trump, et al a direct path to a lawsuit against the federal government and AGs of states cause to sue the federal government. It could very well (and imo will) lead to a church committee of sorts.

That said, not sure if the powers are established enough to just resist all of it (they might be).

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by amluto on Friday December 16, 2022 @11:15PM (#34024579)
> Regardless, while you may call this “underwhelming” it’s actually hard proof of illegal activity. The FBI cannot censor people, period.

That’s not even remotely true.

> That’s fascism

May I suggest looking up fascism?

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by RetpolineDrama on Friday December 16, 2022 @11:56PM (#34024864)
Fascism is the merger of state and corporate power.

Here, we see the merger of state and corporate power.

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by scifibestfi on Saturday December 17, 2022 @12:32AM (#34025087)
Is fascism closer to free speech or is it closer to censorship?
[dead]
Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by scifibestfi on Saturday December 17, 2022 @01:03AM (#34025262)
The civil rights movement used free speech to get civil rights.

The problem isn't free speech.

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by djur on Friday December 16, 2022 @11:21PM (#34024614)
> The FBI cannot censor people, period. That’s fascism and illegal in the US

The FBI emailing Twitter to report possible violations of Twitter's terms of service is not censorship and it is not illegal.

> This effectively gives trump, et al a direct path to a lawsuit against the federal government

The FBI reported to Trump during the 2020 election cycle. It was headed by his own handpicked director, under the supervision of his own handpicked Attorney General.

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by RetpolineDrama on Friday December 16, 2022 @11:57PM (#34024870)
>The FBI emailing Twitter to report possible violations of Twitter's terms of service is not censorship and it is not illegal.

It's clearly the FBI asking "will anyone rid me of this troublesome priest".

Jail for everyone involved, these people need to be made an example of

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by cassac on Friday December 16, 2022 @11:59PM (#34024880)
I think what people are concerned about is the selectiveness of the reports.

What if the FBI only happened to report violations by Asians. Or only violations by women?

I guess it would not be censorship, and I guess it would not be not illegal either, but it would make people wonder if there is an agenda.

It’s as much about the violations reported as the violations left unreported.

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by djur on Saturday December 17, 2022 @12:47AM (#34025178)
The FBI reported tweets from Democrats as well as Republicans, and also apparently a parody of the pro wrestler The Undertaker where the joke is that he craps his pants regularly. Not seeing any evidence that there's any political bias to the reports, and if there was I certainly wouldn't expect the FBI of all organizations to be biased against conservatives.
Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by RetpolineDrama on Saturday December 17, 2022 @12:10AM (#34024947)
>The FBI emailing Twitter to report possible violations of Twitter's terms of service is not censorship and it is not illegal.

It's worse than illegal, it's state funded goons acting to suppress US Citizens of their constitutionally protected rights.

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by Apocryphon on Saturday December 17, 2022 @12:11AM (#34024959)
It's acting like a bunch of Karens asking to speak to the manger and it's very cringe
Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by djur on Saturday December 17, 2022 @12:48AM (#34025182)
It absolutely is no such thing.
Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by dang on Monday December 19, 2022 @07:40PM (#34059977)
Could you please stop using HN primarily for ideological battle? It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for, so we ban accounts that do it (regardless of what they're battling for or against).

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by RetpolineDrama on Monday December 26, 2022 @11:00PM (#34144952)
Could you please run HN effectively? I don't like banning websites at my work, but honestly the way "dang" runs shit at HN it seems like the only option is to start IP filtering you.

How about you take a look at the rules and consider which of them are wrong, and what got you into this situation in the first place.

Your compliance is appreciated.

Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by cratermoon on Friday December 16, 2022 @11:45PM (#34024787)
Re:The Twitter Files, Part Six by Yoric on Saturday December 17, 2022 @07:11AM (#34027110)
Thanks for the reference! Best write up I've seen so far on the topic.