Re:Risk of 'dead pool' looms at Colorado River meeting
by jahewson on Saturday December 17, 2022 @02:16AM
(#34025601)
I'm struggling to believe that it's a "a huge portion" given that Saudi Arabia has less than 1/10th the population of the US. Still, the story you link to is an amazing self-own on the part of Arizona.
Re:Risk of 'dead pool' looms at Colorado River meeting
by StanislavPetrov on Saturday December 17, 2022 @04:37AM
(#34026325)
>So far, four California water districts have proposed to reduce water use by up to 400,000 acre-feet per year. That would amount to about 9% of the state’s total water allotment from the river through 2026.
Even a 10% reduction in use due to Saudi exports would be higher than the current goal. It is considered a national security risk to export encryption to foreign countries, but it isn't a national security risk to export our water? And why are we growing such water-intensive crops in a desert to begin with?
Re:Risk of 'dead pool' looms at Colorado River meeting
by phpisthebest on Saturday December 17, 2022 @08:30AM
(#34027581)
At a gut emotional level this would be true
but trade is what has kept the world wars a bay. Start down the path of protectionism and what we see in Russia/UKR will seem like a nice day at the park
a Middle East-China-Russia vs US-EU-UK-AU-CAN would be the likely outcome, and not good for economic stability or national security
Re:Risk of 'dead pool' looms at Colorado River meeting
by sitkack on Saturday December 17, 2022 @02:52PM
(#34031500)
Not sucking a river dry isn't protectionism. Or now protectionism means protecting a river, which it should.
Re:Risk of 'dead pool' looms at Colorado River meeting
by insane_dreamer on Monday December 19, 2022 @12:01PM
(#34054448)
"free markets"
(https://www.12news.com/article/news/local/water-wars/saudi-a....)