Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

Re:Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-... by nulld3v on Thursday December 15, 2022 @03:02PM (#34004872)

Yeah, I also currently believe that the statistics work out in favor of the vaccine. I am curious though, on how those 3 people died.

My biggest concern is in long-term effects. I understand that it is difficult to study them but that is why I am advocating for continued research.

So basically:

- I understand that in a pandemic situation, you can't wait for research into long-term effects to come out.

- Hence, in a pandemic situation, immediate vaccination should still be recommended.

- Research into long-term effects should continue after the pandemic.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-... by mrtksn on Thursday December 15, 2022 @03:04PM (#34004899)

Is there anything make you believe that the research doesn't continue?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-... by nulld3v on Thursday December 15, 2022 @03:26PM (#34005219)

I am worried how the discussion around the vaccine has turned political and how there are a lot of strong opinions around it. I worry it might affect funding and also "politically taint" people who publish research about it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-... by mrtksn on Thursday December 15, 2022 @03:31PM (#34005286)

Fair enough but this doesn't mean that the research is finished, just the reporting on it is getting harder. People who actually work with these things instead of pushing their agenda are not really influenced by the politics because what they find is not political. They will not find out that bug Pharma was lying, they will find out how many people actually had myocarditis under what conditions for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]