> How can he immediately turn from "people shouldn't post publicly available information that can be abusable" to posting someone's abusable public information?

Hypocrisy

Because he's a terrible person who doesn't really care for anyone or anything other than himself and his giant pile of gold.

It's possible to do great things and still be a terrible person. I know some people might find it hard to believe but it's also possible for people to change as they age/get richer/get more powerful/get less powerful/get poorer etc. Elon 10 years ago isn't Elon today.

Yeah, ex. Pablo Escobar bombed a flight with hundreds of people on it, killed thousands of police officers and many more civilians etc.

BUT he also built churches and schools in the poor neighborhood he grew up in.

So he did some really terrible things and was overall a terrible person, BUT he also did some really good things.

Don't know. If someone threatened my little kid I'd probably sh*t on moral doxxing reservations, too.

His children are only tools for him. He only cares about them as long as they provide him value.

What an awful thing to claim. Do you have any sources to support this?

Well he joined the rest of the haters so he's allowed to type such horrid things because apparently the internet morale council allowed it..

Could you elaborate how that site proves anything? I can create a github page and type "Elon Musk hates all children". Does that also mean it's a proof?

The original source of that info was [1] - a reasonably reputable journal, I believe, and I would suggest an order of magnitude more reliable than "a github page". Not least because you can be sure that their legal team went through it with a fine toothcomb before it was published.

[1] https://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/a5380/millionaire-start...

One piece evidence is that he has what, 9 or 10 (at least) kids with 3 or 4 (at least) women, including (at least) one employee.

All evidence points to him liking to sire and not to father.

People who post unsubstantiated bullshit like this don't care about sources or even reality.

>Show me on the doll where the Elon touched you.

No really, what makes you believe this?

This is a truly horrible thing to say about another human being.

So you'd be calm enough to institute new anti-doxxing rules in your social media company before deciding to dox the person you think is bothering you? I could get understand acting rashly while the emotions are high, but I find it difficult to see this chain of events that way.

"An eye for an eye" kind of thinking.

Link to the tweet? I can't find it.

It's part of the thread in the post I'm responding to, but here https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603235998263123969