Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by HWR_14 on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @11:56PM
(#33980166)
Those who got out will be told they need to give back 50% (assuming you are right that that is how much was left).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by TedDoesntTalk on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @12:16AM
(#33980261)
Even non-US customers? How?
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by HWR_14 on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:19AM
(#33980611)
The US has an excellent record of recovering stolen money from most places you would want to live (and reciprocally of helping other countries)
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by Scoundreller on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:50AM
(#33980765)
Maybe I wouldn’t, but at least a billion people live somewhere happily out of US extra-jurisdiction.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by oblio on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @04:51AM
(#33981686)
Do you have a list with those places? Google isn't helping much.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by Cass on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @07:43AM
(#33982713)
I assume they're referring to the over a billion people living in China. Whether China is a place you'd want to live depends entirely on your personal cirumstances, of course.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by dcow on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:29AM
(#33980668)
How?
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by HWR_14 on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:47AM
(#33980750)
Bankruptcy law allows for the clawback of preferential transfers. Any transfers within 90 days of bankruptcy are assumed to be preferential. Or transfers for a longer time to insiders. And that's without fraud. With fraud they can go back farther. Like, Madoff's investors who got out in time had to turn over a lot of cash.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by dcow on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @04:21PM
(#33990773)
But this is nothing like the Madoff situation. So you're saying if I withdraw my rightful funds 80 days before a company goes bankrupt, and I use those funds to pay for consumable goods, and consume those goods, that those funds can be clawed back and I am now in debt? That doesn't sound right at all.
I also just looked and a preferential transfer would be when the company that goes bankrupt deliberately pays off some debs but not others, hence giving some creditors preference. The notion does not seem to extend to individuals otherwise regularly conducting business with the company. That can't be resolved the way you suggested. Customers who ran FTX will not be required to return their funds so that someone can distribute some of their money to FTX's creditors, or even so that things can be "fairly" distributed across all customers...
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by HWR_14 on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @09:20PM
(#33994247)
Not only can it happen like that, it can happen like that even if there is no fraud. Paying off some customers you owe money to would be giving those creditors preference, I don't see how else you could interpret it.
Heck, FTX went out of its way to only allow Bahamian citizens to withdraw money at the end, imagining that would be the jury pool deciding their fate soon.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind...
by dcow on Thursday December 15, 2022 @03:09PM
(#34004957)
I don't believe it would even be possible to "claw back" consumed goods, is my point. If you can link to some examples of ordinary people getting money clawed back because they withdrew it form a financial institution prior to bankruptcy, please do, because I simply don't understand how that's possible. The money is gone.