News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by this_user on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @07:25PM (#33978333)
People have already looked into this, and the claims on FTX' debt were valued at 5c on the dollar. Alameda has burned through billions, and most of what was left were illiquid shitcoins and other worthless junk. Madoff, at least, was dealing with real assets.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by panarky on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @08:49PM (#33979021)
> burned through billions

If Alameda lost the billions, then who won the billions? Who was on the other side of those trades?

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by sam345 on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @10:16PM (#33979603)
I'd be surprised if you could claw back actual trades on an open arms-length market assuming that's what the FTX exchange was. In Madoff's case, there were no trades at all. Madoff collected the money from his investors, generated fake statements showing inflated fake balances and profitable trades (that never actually occurred) and then selectively doled out limited cash redemptions until everyone demanded their money back at once and the whole thing came crashing down. In SBF's case, it looks like SBF took money from his customers, and then bought or sold crypto in arms-length transactions on an open exchange. If that's the case it's hard to see how they can get the money back from the other side of the trades where his counterparties were buying or selling on the market in good faith. I think the only hope is that if they can somehow get the assets from his affiliated entities and/or reclaim assets that SBF and/or his companies still have control over whether on the block chain or elsewhere.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by ericbarrett on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @10:48PM (#33979794)
Matt Levine has speculated that a bunch of the money was lost via market-making with insufficient controls (margin enforcement etc.). For example, as reported by the Financial Times (via Levine's Dec. 5 newsletter, "Crypto had a Credit Bubble"):

[begin quote]

In April 2021, a crypto token called MobileCoin — used for payments in the privacy-focused messaging app Signal — suddenly spiked in price from about $6 to almost $70, before crashing back down again almost as quickly.

The wild moves came after a trader on FTX had built an unusually large position in the little-known token. Two people familiar with the matter said that when the price rose, the trader used the position to borrow against it on FTX, potentially a scheme to extract dollars from the exchange.

Alameda was forced to step in and assume the trader’s position to protect FTX. The trading company’s loss on this deal was at least in the hundreds of millions of dollars, the people said, and as high as $1bn, according to one of the people, wiping out a large share of Alameda’s 2021 trading profits.

[end quote]

...So whomever was on the other side of positions like that. Savvy outsider or well-informed insider? Who knows! Maybe it can be reclaimed, or maybe it's long dispersed down a chain of dozens of crypto exchanges, tumblers, offshore fiat accounts, and so forth. I expect we'll learn a lot more over the next few weeks as the federal case ramps up and the bankruptcy executor delivers more findings.

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by oblio on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @04:49AM (#33981676)
Seeing this:

> The wild moves came after a trader on FTX had built an unusually large position in the little-known token. Two people familiar with the matter said that when the price rose, the trader used the position to borrow against it on FTX, potentially a scheme to extract dollars from the exchange.

Makes calling regular currency "fiat" super ironic:

> offshore fiat accounts

It looks like at the end of the day, cryptocurrency is something people "fiat" out of thin air, "fair" algorithms and computers and systems be damned.

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by ShredKazoo on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @11:47PM (#33980107)
One blogger's estimate of their losses:

>Voyager/BlockFi acquisition: 1.5b

>LUNA exposure: 1b

>KCG-style algo crash: 1b

>FTT/SRM collateral maintenance: 2b

>Venture capital: 2b

>Real estate, branding, other frivolous spending: 2b

>FTT drop from $22 to $4: 4b

>Discretionary longs going bad: 2b

>Total: 15.5 billion

https://milkyeggs.com/?p=175

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by seanhunter on Thursday December 15, 2022 @12:14AM (#33995518)
Reminds me of the famous quote by the footballer George Best “I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.”
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by gitfan86 on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @07:15AM (#33982468)
There was never "billions" of deposits in the first place. Someone mints a coin and pays FTX 5 million to list it. Then that person pays influencers and invests themselves to get the price of the coin to go up. Now on paper that coin is worth "100 million". But in reality only 8 million dollars has been spent.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by rvba on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:30PM (#33988834)
This is often very ignored in analysis, most (if not all) those coins have prizes based on inflated valuations.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by lmm on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @11:39PM (#33980070)
Ever wondered where the money to make crypto go up was coming from?
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by Scoundreller on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:47AM (#33980751)
I’m surprised bitcoin is holding up as well as it is
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by kkielhofner on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @07:39AM (#33982677)
I don't pretend to fully understand markets but movement on BTC, etc with all of these developments is just further proof to me there is no connection between any of these coins and reality.

As another example, when Ethereum successfully moved to proof of stake without a hitch (an ultimately impressive and challenging development) the price actually went down.

I don't understand anything in this space.

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by mthoms on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @09:09AM (#33983640)
Lots of events are already "priced in" before they happen. That is, investors have anticipated the upcoming event (eg Ethereum upgrade) and the stock/token price has already moved accordingly.

https://obliviousinvestor.com/what-does-it-mean-for-somethin...

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by kkielhofner on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @09:25AM (#33983866)
Even with that how does this[0] chart make any sense?

[0] - https://www.coindesk.com/embedded-chart/tcPpzTgN6bBC9

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by panarky on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:57PM (#33988229)
It's not clear to me that the collapse of corrupt crypto exchanges should make the price of bitcoin drop.

What is the mechanism exactly? It's not like FTX holds a shitload of bitcoin and now suddenly they have to sell it all, driving down the price.

Is the mechanism just some kind of psychological thing, where a centralized criminal enterprise is associated with "crypto", even though it was mostly esoteric shit like FTT and MobileCoin and not bitcoin, but since bitcoin is also "crypto" then people who hold it would sell it because FTX folded?

It's like saying the collapse of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers should somehow make US dollars worth less.

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by kkielhofner on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:29PM (#33988816)
1) I would expect a fairly large portion of people are selling their cryptocurrencies on exchanges and wiring out in fiat instead of undertaking the relatively technically challenging process of moving them on chain to somewhere/something else. While we can see on chain activity acknowledged numbers citing "withdrawals" from exchanges don't provide specifics. I personally know several people who have just said "Yeah turns out the entire thing is a scam, I don't trust anything and I'll just cut my losses and be done with it all".

2) Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers were not a total loss that resulted in the founder being arrested and charged with multiple counts of fraud within weeks with multiple reports from the guy who handled the failure of Enron (John J Ray) expressing public incredulity on just how crazy the whole thing was. Failed crypto institutions aren't receiving TARP loans or being absorbed by other institutions. I'm not saying what caused the 2008 financial crisis wasn't criminal but as we all know no one went to jail over it, which if nothing else highlights the differences in terms of public opinion and treatment by regulators.

3) Any comparison between crypto (individual coin or the entire ecosystem) and the world's reserve currency backed by the world's largest economy is dubious at best. The complete collapse of a couple of even the largest banks barely puts a dent in USD in terms of circulating supply, activity, etc. USD has this status because it's backed by what is considered to be the most financially stable institution in the world - the United States. In the minds of many if crypto is "backed" by anything it's people like SBF, the VCs this kid was able to hoodwink, etc.

4) The collapse of FTX has had an incredible ripple effect that has caused at least a dozen other entities (that I've tracked) within crypto to fail.

5) Over the past few weeks there has been increased focus and media attention on the shadiness of Binance, Tether, and virtually every other crypto exchange/institution up to and including Coinbase.

This is all reflected in a survey from a couple of weeks ago that indicates just 8% of Americans have a positive view of cryptocurrencies[0]. I'm sure if they ran that survey again now that number would be even lower.

So yeah, I would expect crypto prices to move downward significantly.

[0] - https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/07/just-8percent-of-americans-h...

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by panarky on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @03:10PM (#33989623)
Okay, then to summarize, you're saying there's lots of shady stuff with centralized exchanges, and more of them could go bankrupt, and people with fiat and shitcoins and bitcoin on deposit there could lose it.

There's a run on the bank, people want out, and the easiest way to get out is to sell your shitcoins and your bitcoin, and wire transfer dollars to your bank account.

With all the selling of bitcoin to raise cash, the price of bitcoin must drop.

And yet the bitcoin price is up six percent in the last seven days, so there must be some other mechanism at work.

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by kkielhofner on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @03:23PM (#33989885)
More or less - exactly but like I said in my original post, almost nothing in this space makes sense to me. I'm trying to decide if there's something I'm missing (happens a lot) or like Theranos, mortgages and real estate in 2006, WeWork, etc (which I always knew were off) it's all being propped up by who/what knows what and it's just a matter of time before it crashes and burns.

I moved to Florida in 2006 and have distinct memories of meeting sleazy and disgusting mortgage brokers from Countrywide, real estate agents, etc flaunting their fast cash while thinking all along "this doesn't seem right". I basically watched "The Big Short" in realtime... Same goes for Theranos (it's been 10 years, where is your product?) and WeWork (wait aren't you just leasing out office space?).

Crypto is 14 years in and absent a few extremely rare use cases like fleeing a dictatorship, dealing with currency destabilization in developing nations, etc no one uses it for anything other than trading on exchanges, which at this point seems like Russian roulette.

It's as though the last remaining "widespread" use case for crypto has now almost been effectively wiped out.

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by lmm on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @04:13PM (#33990657)
The collapse of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers did make US dollars worth less, quite rightly.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by tananaev on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @12:02AM (#33980200)
A lot of it is probably stolen. A lot went into thousands of worthless altcoins and their devs got rich. Another big portion is probably advertising. They spent big on YouTube influencers. Basically a lot of people got rich and a lot more people got screwed.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by heartbeats on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:01AM (#33980821)
Altcoin devs are not paid well; Bitcoin devs make entirely normal SWE salaries according to public information, and I can't imagine DogeCoin or whatever is any better. All the big money is in marketing, since that's what creates the value.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by oblio on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @04:49AM (#33981680)
By devs he probably doesn't mean software devs, but coin creators.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by coffeebeqn on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @10:49PM (#33979798)
The crypto market? You can’t just unwind the markets by a few months to fix things
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by vkou on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @11:00PM (#33979862)
> Who was on the other side of those trades?

Unrelated funds, and random morons from crypto's equivalent of r/wallstreetbets.

It's very easy to lose a lot of money, really quickly in the markets.