News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by ClumsyPilot on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @03:51PM (#33975581)
You are comparing company that makes trucks with a company that makes precision scientific instrumers, and you are declaring that truck companu is more efficient per kilo of produce. this is stupid.

Nasa develops nuclear reactors, landed on titan and has reached pluto. Spacex vehicle has never left the Earth-moon system.

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by mynameisvlad on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @04:43PM (#33976313)
SpaceX is not Tesla. It's disingenuous to call SpaceX a "company that makes trucks". Just like NASA, they also make precision scientific instruments. They're the first privately funded mission to the ISS and run a massive satellite constellation.

They may not have the same accomplishments as NASA, but they're far from a "company that makes trucks".

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by ClumsyPilot on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @06:41PM (#33977935)
> Just like NASA, they also make precision scientific instruments.

Which scientific instruments does SpaceX make? I have never heard of a single one.

In contrast, curiosity rover has dozens.

https://youtu.be/GUQ91fdYbP4

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by mynameisvlad on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:15AM (#33980893)
You think their satellite fleet has absolutely no precise equipment for knowing and maintaining its position? Or for communicating with terminals and each other?

Like, come on. I get shitting on Musk is the cool new thing, but this is genuinely the case where SpaceX is doing cool things in space, and at an extremely fast pace. Get over yourself if you can’t see through your Musk hate and only see them as “a company that builds trucks”.

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by ftlio on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @05:38PM (#33977175)
The analogy is apt in at least defining a separation between the overall complexity of what SpaceX produces compared to NASA, to say something of how the two different models of R&D work, but maybe off in degrees as you discussed.

"NASA makes precision scientific instruments and SpaceX makes precision scientific instruments that have higher tolerances with a higher focus on throughput, and there are rapidly diminishing returns in how much funding can be used to close the gap" is probably the right take if not as fun.

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by oittaa on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @06:09PM (#33977597)
> Spacex vehicle has never left the Earth-moon system.

https://www.whereisroadster.com/

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by yreg on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @09:32PM (#33979310)
Not your typical space vehicle
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by kortilla on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @05:38PM (#33977171)
Lol “spacex makes trucks”. Way to throw on the anti-Musk blinders and completely ignore the back-half of the comment and misunderstand the first half.

Also, spacex has launched outside of the earth-moon system. It was a roadster