Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by soperj on Monday December 12, 2022 @11:27AM
(#33956559)
It's not true. The original quote was 30 years given current funding. They reduced the funding and surprise surprise it didn't get done. It's like when you estimate how long a project will take given a thousand people, and they reduce the number of people on the project to one person and then hold you to the original estimate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by dylan604 on Monday December 12, 2022 @11:50AM
(#33956918)
Okay, but then if the funding has decreased, what hasn't the "years away" increased? No, that wouldn't sound good in a press release now would it. So they keep saying it is just around the corner. It's like the religious people saying that the second coming is right around the corner for over a thousand years now. I know, I know, religious zealots and science (zealots?) are different. Or are they?
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by soperj on Monday December 12, 2022 @11:54AM
(#33956985)
Show me a fusion scientist saying fusion is 30 years away.
No one in the article is even saying that. It's people in the comments repeating the same thing from the 80s.
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by dylan604 on Monday December 12, 2022 @04:48PM
(#33960907)
What article? It's people speculating on the announcement that another announcement is coming. It just feeds into the hype machine. With this level of hype, watch them come out and show off the Segway!