Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by sudomatic on Monday December 12, 2022 @01:05AM
(#33951436)
Absolutely not! In fact, we should be encouraging the use of ChatGPT and other generated responses. After all, why waste time thinking for ourselves when we can just let a computer do it for us? Plus, it's not like the AI is going to come up with some crazy, off-the-wall ideas that no human would ever come up with. Oh wait... never mind.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by supernikita on Monday December 12, 2022 @01:29AM
(#33951589)
I disagree: mental laziness is never a good justification.
(I recently started to memorize more things, since I do not believe in "just google it").
Also, I want to read what fellow humans relate. Even though it might sometimes be difficult to tell the difference, I attend HN as a substitute for physical social interactions.
For mere knowledge or problem solving, other places might fill that role.
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by xxs on Monday December 12, 2022 @02:53AM
(#33952073)
It was a sarcastic response.
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by js8 on Monday December 12, 2022 @03:17AM
(#33952219)
From what I have seen, HN is not especially keen on sarcasm either. Which I somewhat disagree with, I think it's a good alternative way how to make people think about something, rather than directly attacking the argument.
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by fragmede on Monday December 12, 2022 @03:52AM
(#33952442)
If ML algos ever manage to recognize sarcasm then we're truly in trouble. Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers. Tone just doesn't come across well in text.
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by xxs on Monday December 12, 2022 @04:27AM
(#33952693)
>Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the Internet, especially for non-native speakers.
I have heard (seen) the statement so many times. Personally, I find it quite trivial to detect; so I suppose it's partly related to how much sarcasm one would indulge in normal daily routine.
>Tone just doesn't come across
Gotta train on that dead pan delivery.