You don't have much experience with corporate acquisitions, do you?
The Acquiree CEO always leaves after a year or three, unless Acquirer is a company like Cisco that's really good at it. Why?
Because Acquirer has middle manager drones, who continually complain about the how Acquiree is not "aligning with our strategy." Eventually, Acquiree's CEO gets sick of it and quits.
But you're right - they won't maintain it as a separate app. Because those drones can wear anyone out.
Also Iām very familiar with acquisitions particularly at Google.
Not sure what Google ultimately got out of Zagat rather than maybe a bit of kickstart for restaurant ratings.
Tim Zagat invited us all to visit him if we were in MYC, to get a good restaurant recommendation (and reservation? I'm not sure if he said that).
... I'm not arguing whether or not they intended to keep the apps separate? If you want to know why he left, he's already told you[1].
>Knowing Google, I find it hard to believe that Waze under the Google maps lead will get resources and continue.
Sure. Agreed. That's not what this comment chain was discussing, though. You sure you responded to the right post?
[1]https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-did-i-leave-google-stay-s...
The article clearly states that SHE left with no explanation why:
Waze CEO Neha Parikh will exit her role following a transition period
You're referencing an article that is over a year old about a completely different person.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-did-i-leave-google-stay-s...