Anyway I find it weird anyone can see how much profit my company had last year
I tried searching up some examples of subsidiaries of larger companies and the 'Beneficial Owners' section doesn't actually contain who ultimately owns the company.
For example Toyota in Estonia:
Toyota Baltic Aktsiaselts (10234087) https://ariregister.rik.ee/eng/company/10234087?active_tab=r...
Has 1 board member listed.
SIA Toyota Material Handling Baltic Eesti filiaal (11629379) https://ariregister.rik.ee/eng/company/11629379/SIA-Toyota-M...
Has no one listed at all, which would be illegal?, if the law mandates it.
Eesti Toyota Ühing (80226178) https://ariregister.rik.ee/eng/company/80226178/Eesti-Toyota...
Has 3 board members listed.
SIA Toyota Material Handling is the registration of a foreign company (Latvia), and says beneficial owner information isn’t required, presumably because it’s up to their home country to get that data.
Eesti Toyota lists their board members as beneficial owners. If you note their areas of activity it’s “Associations and social clubs related to recreational activities, entertainment, cultural activities or hobbies”, so I’d say not actually related to Toyota like you thought.
I'm surprised Toyota HQ would let them use their name on official documents if it's completely unrelated.
For Toyota Baltic, obviously the sole listed board member is not the 'Ultimate Beneficial Owner' or even any 'Beneficial Owner' since Toyota Baltic is a legally controlled subsidiary of a much much larger company.
Which the board member does not own, nor are they likely to be the sole beneficial owner of any intermediate holding company.
The 'Beneficial Owner' is very very likely just a legal representative.
Similar to the US federal law vs. states, one not enforcing it anymore doesn’t necessarily mean that the rest won’t keep doing it.
https://ariregister.rik.ee/eng