Huh the last linked company does appear to be purely recreational. Though of course it's still not ultimately owned by just those three, unless Estonian 'Associations and social clubs' are very different from what I understand.

I'm surprised Toyota HQ would let them use their name on official documents if it's completely unrelated.

For Toyota Baltic, obviously the sole listed board member is not the 'Ultimate Beneficial Owner' or even any 'Beneficial Owner' since Toyota Baltic is a legally controlled subsidiary of a much much larger company.

Which the board member does not own, nor are they likely to be the sole beneficial owner of any intermediate holding company.

The 'Beneficial Owner' is very very likely just a legal representative.