News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by w0m on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @03:11PM (#33806937)
> using Tesla car owners as unpaid betatesters

Almost right.

Charging Tesla owners to beta test their autonomous driving software.

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by dexterdog on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @04:22PM (#33807899)
Almost fully right. Charging and risking Tesla subscribers to beta test their autonomous driving software.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by lancesells on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @04:35PM (#33808092)
So close. Charging and risking Tesla subscribers along with everyone else on the road to beta test their autonomous driving software.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by LanceJones on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @05:36PM (#33808934)
I'm one of those people. Running FSD Beta in my Model S Plaid in BC. And your negative connotation doesn't apply to me or many/most of the other beta testers with whom I'm regularly communicating.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by yreg on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @05:40PM (#33808997)
It's curious how many people are unhappy that someone choses to pay for an early-access product that's in beta.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by trs8080 on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @06:23PM (#33809518)
Most people are probably just amused. I'm more on the unhappy side because a vehicle can actually kill people when it crashes and Musk seems like more of a "move fast and break things" personality, which is not a great combination for safety.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by themacguffinman on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @07:07PM (#33810071)
Maybe because it's unsafe and misleading? The US Department of Justice has already started a criminal investigation [1]:

> Oct 25 - Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) is under criminal investigation in the United States over claims that the company's electric vehicles can drive themselves, three people familiar with the matter said.

> The U.S. Department of Justice launched the previously undisclosed probe last year following more than a dozen crashes, some of them fatal, involving Tesla’s driver assistance system Autopilot, which was activated during the accidents, the people said.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/legal/exclusive-tesla-faces-us-crimi...

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by bmitc on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @08:38PM (#33811092)
I'm unhappy about it because I have to share the road with Tesla's cars, and I'm also tired of people buying wholesale into hype. I personally stay away from Tesla's on the road for fear that they have the "self-driving" software engaged.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by blitzar on Thursday December 01, 2022 @04:29AM (#33814138)
He promised I would be able to earn income on my car driving around town all on its own while I was asleep at home by the end of 2016. Instead I have to pay him to have a computer drive full throttle into stationary objects - something that I am more than capable of doing on my own.